Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Liberal Mitt's Greatest Hits: What Romney Doesn't Want You to See (This video needs to go viral)
You tube video montage ^ | Mitt Romney (various videos)

Posted on 10/04/2011 6:22:03 PM PDT by Halfmanhalfamazing

Liberal Mitt's Greatest Hits: What Romney Doesn't Want You to See


TOPICS: Politics
KEYWORDS: abortion; mittromney; mormon; romney; romneytruthfile; slickmitt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last
If you have a ping list, use it. If you can, email this to everybody you can.

This is why the media doesn't treat Romney the same way it treats Perry, or Palin, or any of the others.

The media knows it can roll him up and smoke him. Mitt Romney is the media's golden ticket to four more years of Obama.

1 posted on 10/04/2011 6:22:05 PM PDT by Halfmanhalfamazing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

...............may find this useful or interesting


2 posted on 10/04/2011 6:25:47 PM PDT by Halfmanhalfamazing ( Media doesn't report, It advertises. So that last advertisement you just read, what was it worth?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Halfmanhalfamazing

Liberal Mitt BTTT


3 posted on 10/04/2011 6:27:06 PM PDT by aMorePerfectUnion (You know, 99.99999965% of the lawyers give all of them a bad name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Halfmanhalfamazing

He’s the perfect crusader for.. women’s rights. HA!

We don’t need Romney. Someone please call Rubio because I don’t see Cain surviving the media. He could surprise us, time will tell. I am not voting Romney, did it before to bump off Grandpa McCain. I will vote Cain, Newt before Mitt.


4 posted on 10/04/2011 6:33:54 PM PDT by Christie at the beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aMorePerfectUnion

He lost the smidgeon of a chance with me when he made the big deal to give the states a waiver from ObamaCare. To make it easy for those who may think this is good for us, remember this; that still leaves ObamaCare the law of the land.

Plus, what kinds of time and/or technical limitations are hiding in those waivers? He won’t elaborate and has never said he would repeal ObamaCare.


5 posted on 10/04/2011 6:34:41 PM PDT by mazda77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Halfmanhalfamazing

I could not listen to it all.
Benefits for everybody except me. I have only worked a honest living for the past 45 years. Screw me.


6 posted on 10/04/2011 6:34:51 PM PDT by JimmyMc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JimmyMc

I could barely stomach the first part of the video.


7 posted on 10/04/2011 6:39:23 PM PDT by Christie at the beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Halfmanhalfamazing

I disagreed with almost everything Mitt said, save the TARP decision. Although morally disgusting, saving our financial system from total collapse was critical. Even better since the taxpayer turned a profit on the investment.


8 posted on 10/04/2011 6:41:19 PM PDT by JosephMama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mazda77

I don’t like Romney.... period. However, your post above regarding him granting waivers is the only legal recourse the next President has. Congress passed it and unless the courts rule the whole thing unconstitutional (I am hopeful) only congress can undo it.

I hope the next President attacks Obamacare and the EPA through other means such as funding and executive orders when possible but the bill that Hagosi and Dingy passed must be overturned by congress.

The legislature passes laws and Presidents can’t overturn them on a whim. The founders set it up that way for a reason and it’s worked pretty good.


9 posted on 10/04/2011 6:44:32 PM PDT by volunbeer (Keep the dope, we'll make the change in 2012!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Halfmanhalfamazing

Thank you to whomever put this together. It is not so much that I heard or saw anything new to me, but the combination of Romney’s lefty stance on so many CENTRAL issues and his shameless self-contradiction only firms up my resolve to oppose the man.


10 posted on 10/04/2011 6:46:38 PM PDT by Dr. Sivana (It's fun to play with your vision, but don't ever play with your eyes.-1970's PSA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JosephMama

“I disagreed with almost everything Mitt said, save the TARP decision. “

People get all upset over TARP. It’s like getting upset at a surgeon for cutting you up to get rid of a cancer caused by smoking.
The most important thing is to make sure we don’t get into another financial crash again. Bush’s support for freddie and fannie was much worse than TARP.


11 posted on 10/04/2011 6:53:21 PM PDT by ari-freedom (I'm a heartless conservative because I love this country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: volunbeer

But, he has still said nothing about supporting repeal now has he?


12 posted on 10/04/2011 6:53:21 PM PDT by mazda77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Halfmanhalfamazing
Mitt Romney is the media's golden ticket to four more years of Obama even if Romney wins the Presidency..
13 posted on 10/04/2011 6:57:28 PM PDT by arthurus (Read Hazlitt's "Economics In One Lesson.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lwd

BOOKMARK


14 posted on 10/04/2011 6:58:55 PM PDT by lwd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Halfmanhalfamazing
Poor old Milt. Kicked in the shins by his own words. Especially telling...

"The TARP money will be paid back." Really? And, "without TARP the economy would be in a free fall. TARP was well worth it." Then there's this golden nugget, "People here illegally should be able to apply for permanent citizenship." Ha! And Milt tried to throw stones at Perry's in-state tuition.

15 posted on 10/04/2011 7:02:05 PM PDT by Jane Long (Soli Deo Gloria!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ari-freedom

If the government had stayed out of it, if there had been no TARP and a “collapse” had occurred it would have fallen out the way the historic situations that once were called “panics” happened. Banks collapsed. badly formed and run companies went out of business. There were a bad couple of quarters then powerful recovery. Government attempts to stop up all the perceived holes only prolong the problem and makes the denouement far worse and longer lasting. If TARP could “work” and save the economy then the laws of economics are refuted and government IS the engine of progress and prosperity. If that is true then we are fools to oppose socialism because it is the government experts who know how to run a business and our lives.


16 posted on 10/04/2011 7:06:37 PM PDT by arthurus (Read Hazlitt's "Economics In One Lesson.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Halfmanhalfamazing

Wow. Just wow.

I was listening to the news today and surfing between all of the cable news channels and EVERY SINGLE ONE was saying something like, “well, Romney will be the nominee now that Christie isn’t going to run”.

No wonder.


17 posted on 10/04/2011 7:11:26 PM PDT by RIghtwardHo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RIghtwardHo

I believe that Romney will be the nominee regardless of what Christie does.He is the MSM and Democrat choice for Republican nominee as was McCain before. The Republicans-for-a-day who reregister for the primaries will all vote for him and there will be a lot of them unless there is a serious contender for the Democrat nomination. Even that prospect will probably have a lot of Democrats voting in the Republican primaries because serious opposition in the primaries is a near guarantee that an incumbent president will not win the election. Romney is the Democrat choice because he will enthusiastically follow the kenyan’s lead and will be more apt to get socialist acts through a Republican Congress in his first two years and the Democrat majority of the last two years will just make things easier. He would, of course, lose the 2016 election because of the total loss of the right two thirds of the Republican Party and would be replaced by a Democrat more competently Left than the kenyan.


18 posted on 10/04/2011 7:22:09 PM PDT by arthurus (Read Hazlitt's "Economics In One Lesson.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: mazda77

I don’t trust him but he has said he would repeal it.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ni6vp7Qgau4

If we asked him in 6 months his answer would be different. That is Romney and it’s why I don’t like him. I don’t think he has bedrock principles rooted in conservatism. I also don’t like someone who has spent the past 6 years or more running for President. Seriously, don’t you have anything better to do? Of all the potential candidates out there since Zero was elected Romney has been the least likely to make a public stand on any issue. That bothers me.

He is the establishment moderate who is benefitting from a free pass from the media because they want to select him as the nominee. They will then savage him over his record, his faith, and past statements. He may be polished but he is really damaged goods as this video shows.


19 posted on 10/04/2011 7:35:46 PM PDT by volunbeer (Keep the dope, we'll make the change in 2012!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Halfmanhalfamazing

You are grossly exaggerating. Will you vote for Bambi instead of Mitt?


20 posted on 10/04/2011 7:38:33 PM PDT by libbylu (Game On!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson