I enjoyed your analyisis, even as I disagreed with the conclusion. The country is going to hell in a hand-basket. If we don’t get our fiscal house in order PDQ, things are going to get very bad for everyone. Palin is concerned for the future of her country and her children. She recognizes that none of the current crop of candidates has the will and/or intestitinal fortitude to do what must be done. I don’t think she is looking for an opening, and if she doesn’t get it, will wait until 2016. Sarah is a leader, not the kind of person who bases her decisions on what others do. She will force the door open if necessary.
My whole piece, blown all to hell. I only put in those last couple of sentences to round out, as an afterthought: not as the central contention.
Now I'm gonna go sulk.
Palin is concerned for the future of her country and her children.
Agreed completely: she's torn between the immediate vs. the long-term risk to her family.
She recognizes that none of the current crop of candidates has the will and/or intestitinal fortitude to do what must be done.
Agreed, with the *possible* exception of Cain: if you've survived Stage IV cancer, what the hell else can really hurt you, short of a contact nuclear blast?
I dont think she is looking for an opening, and if she doesnt get it, will wait until 2016.
I meant the first, the 2nd was filler and a "worst case" for her. But on reflection I think you're right.
Sarah is a leader, not the kind of person who bases her decisions on what others do.
Agreed completely.
She will force the door open if necessary.
Sh*t, you're probably right, I hadn't thought of that.
Cheers!
“Sarah is a leader, not the kind of person who bases her decisions on what others do. She will force the door open if necessary.”
I agree. when the time comes. Sarah will kick that door open loudly.