Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: BuckeyeTexan
You make legitimate points in your posts.

Yet the fact remains that Perry as governor embraced the idea of the state taking control of a child's body. Of course they believed they were doing the right thing. The people behind Obamacare think the same thing. Similar reasoning is used for both. The Gardasil"opt-out" was meaningless. The correct way to do it would have been an "opt-in." He basically gave the state, not parents, all control of the issue. Isn't that why we bash liberals?

The cornerstone of American life is individual liberty. Rick Perry, for just a moment, forgot that fact. Yes, he has walked back his decision. But it's troubling that he at one time mandated allowing the state to hijack the personal healthcare decisions of Texas citizens. His EO bypassed the elected legislature. One of Malkin's posters commented that if a Democrat governor had done this, a lot of pro-Perry people would have had a huge problem with it. I agree.

The vaccine was untested at the time this occurred, and it will still take years to study its long-term effects. I don't have children, but if I did, they would never get anywhere near Gardasil.

154 posted on 08/17/2011 12:58:19 PM PDT by floozy22 (“Former Pennsylvania Sen. Rick Santorum has called sharia law an “existential threat to America.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies ]


To: floozy22

Agreed. Perry’s decision on Gardasil was wrong. Thankfully, Texans were able to prevent the consequences of that decision. Perry realizes that. I think he learned a lot from the incident.


158 posted on 08/17/2011 2:33:34 PM PDT by BuckeyeTexan (Man is not free unless government is limited. ~Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson