Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Does Obama Even Realize How Bad His Speeches Are?
http://libertarian-neocon.blogspot.com/2011/08/does-obama-even-realize-how-bad-his.html ^ | libertarian neocon

Posted on 08/08/2011 3:07:47 PM PDT by libertarian neocon

Remember how during the debt ceiling negotiations Obama went before the country what seemed like almost every day in order to call for tax increases, vilify the GOP, attack corporate jet depreciation schedules yet pretend to be a centrist? Well, his poll numbers still haven't recovered from that so you have to wonder why he felt the need to go before the country today with markets imploding. Did he think he could reassure the world with his magical speech-giving ability? Well if he did, he failed miserably. Check out this chart:

I do realize markets were imploding anyway, but they seemed to stabilize a bit before the speech, only to freefall after people realized he doesn't have a clue (I also don't think it helped that he was 50 minutes late). The Dow went down 200 points in a span of about 45 minutes after he started talking and after a brief bout of short covering, ended closing down over 600 points on the day!

Why was the speech so bad? Because it showed how clueless the President of the United States is in his first job with actual administrative duties. Here are some highlights:

On Friday, we learned that the United States received a downgrade by one of the credit rating agencies -- not so much because they doubt our ability to pay our debt if we make good decisions, but because after witnessing a month of wrangling over raising the debt ceiling, they doubted our political system’s ability to act.

He is basically opening the speech by saying he doesn't take the worries about our debt seriously. Yes, S&P did talk about their worries about the effectiveness of our political system with two parties so far apart but they also wrote, "a higher public debt trajectory than we currently assume could lead us to lower the long-term rating again." Clearly the debt issue is the #1 reason for us being downgraded. If our debt to GDP ratio was half what it was today, Congress could squabble all they wan't and we wouldn't be downgraded. It's the debt, stupid. I think the market would have felt better if he actually sounded serious about tackling the debt.

The markets, on the other hand, continue to believe our credit status is AAA. In fact, Warren Buffett, who knows a thing or two about good investments, said, “If there were a quadruple-A rating, I’d give the United States that.” I, and most of the world’s investors, agree.

Really, the markets believe we are AAA? On what basis? Some actual data would be good here. Please don't tell me it's because of the flight to safety into treasuries today. Anyway instead of saying something substantive to reassure the markets, he quotes one of his donors, whose company was given an negative outlook today by S&P because of the US downgrade. Not exactly a disinterested and objective party now is he?

That doesn’t mean we don’t have a problem. The fact is, we didn’t need a rating agency to tell us that we need a balanced, long-term approach to deficit reduction. That was true last week. That was true last year. That was true the day I took office.
He makes it sound like he has always been a centrist, inclusive of the GOP as he tried to find a balanced, bi-partisan solution.  Remember when he told the GOP "I won" during negotiations over the failed stimulus?  Remember when he told McCain "the election is over" at the Healthcare Summit?  Or when he said he didn't want the GOP "to do a lot of talking"?  When did he discover this need for "balance" anyway?

Last week, we reached an agreement that will make historic cuts to defense and domestic spending.  But there’s not much further we can cut in either of those categories.  What we need to do now is combine those spending cuts with two additional steps:  tax reform that will ask those who can afford it to pay their fair share and modest adjustments to health care programs like Medicare.  
I'm not sure how much he thinks he can squeeze out of "the wealthy" but as I showed here, taxes would have to go be about 100% on "the wealthy" to close the budget gap.  Also, this once again shows how clueless he is.  The markets are imploding and all he can talk about are tax increases?  That is the kind of talk that sends markets down, which is exactly where they went while he was talking.  The wealthy already pay more than their fair share of taxes anyway.

I realize that after what we just went through, there’s some skepticism that Republicans and Democrats on the so-called super committee, this joint committee that’s been set up, will be able to reach a compromise, but my hope is that Friday’s news will give us a renewed sense of urgency.  I intend to present my own recommendations over the coming weeks on how we should proceed.  And that committee will have this administration’s full cooperation.  And I assure you, we will stay on it until we get the job done.  
Woohoo! He'll present his recommendations to a committee!  That'll change everything because Congressional committee's are known for their bold and quick action!  I also won't hold my breath with regards to his recommendations.  Even when we were on the brink of disaster he still didn't want to publicize a plan.  I guess it's because his last budget was so out of touch that it was voted down unanimously in the Senate 97-0!

Of course, as worrisome as the issues of debt and deficits may be, the most immediate concern of most Americans, and of concern to the marketplace as well, is the issue of jobs and the slow pace of recovery coming out of the worst recession in our lifetimes.
So this is the paragraph where he says he is blowing off the downgrade.  It's really amazing how tone deaf he is.  Our debt is downgraded and the markets are imploding and he starts talking about "the most immediate concern" which is not debt.  Investors wanted him to stand up, act like he knows what he is doing and sound convincing in cutting our deficit.  This reminds me of how when people were concerned about their jobs he decided to make hiring that much more expensive through Obamacare.

Specifically, we should extend the payroll tax cut as soon as possible, so that workers have more money in their paychecks next year and businesses have more customers next year.

We should continue to make sure that if you’re one of the millions of Americans who’s out there looking for a job, you can get the unemployment insurance that your tax dollars contributed to.  That will also put money in people’s pockets and more customers in stores.

First, it's pretty clear the payroll tax cut hasn't been enough to create jobs.  Second, isn't this speech supposed to be about cutting the deficit, not talking about two programs which will make it worse.  Third, tell me again how unemployment insurance helps create jobs again?

These aren’t Democratic proposals.  These aren’t big government proposals.  These are all ideas that traditionally Republicans have agreed to, have agreed to countless times in the past.  There’s no reason we shouldn’t act on them now.  None.  
So besides the debt just being downgraded by S&P with more to come?  That's not a reason to constrain some of these "stimulus" packages?  How about a compromise, we lower the payroll taxes (I'm all for letting people keep more of their own money) and that's it.

Markets will rise and fall, but this is the United States of America.  No matter what some agency may say, we’ve always been and always will be a AAA country. 
I get the feeling this line sounded better in rehearsal.  Obviously, if we keep spending like we are spending we won't be anywhere near a AAA country.  Also, wouldn't it have been nice to the President to actually talk about returning the United States to AAA status at S&P?  But I guess that would have required a real leader, something we clearly don't have.  No wonder the markets tanked.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: debt; debtmanwalking; deficit; economy; obama; zerosumgame
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

1 posted on 08/08/2011 3:07:52 PM PDT by libertarian neocon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: libertarian neocon

Narcissists never think they are part of the problem.


2 posted on 08/08/2011 3:10:25 PM PDT by Retired Greyhound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libertarian neocon

Obumbles.


3 posted on 08/08/2011 3:10:36 PM PDT by corlorde (NH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libertarian neocon

he just reads them he doesn’t have to listen to them


4 posted on 08/08/2011 3:13:56 PM PDT by molson209
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libertarian neocon

It doesn’t matter what he thinks. Those who worship him believe he’s the greatest speaker of all times. They can’t tell you what he said because they’re too mesmerized.


5 posted on 08/08/2011 3:15:14 PM PDT by Terry Mross (I'll only vote for a SECOND party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libertarian neocon

It’s very simple really. President Ego’s speeches are MEANT to tank the market as well as deflate the citizenry.


6 posted on 08/08/2011 3:16:39 PM PDT by subterfuge (BUILD MORE NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS NOW!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libertarian neocon

Maybe Valerie Jarrett is the one writing his speeches for him - after all, his main duty is to read the teleprompter ....


7 posted on 08/08/2011 3:19:23 PM PDT by Ken522
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Retired Greyhound

He’s like a punk Chavez. Or Mao getting up and lecturing to the proles for hours on end.


8 posted on 08/08/2011 3:20:42 PM PDT by Rytas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: libertarian neocon

That’s something I never understood.

There has been thousands of articles saying what a “wonderful” speech-giver he is, but I never saw that.

Some of his soundbites sounded good if you don’t listen to the content, but mostly he bobs and weaves like a chicken, he avoids eye contact (or even looking at cameras) whenever he can, and you always get the impression that even during the speech, he’s thinking to himself “I look good...Don’t I look good?...I know I look good”...

Weird narcissism personified.


9 posted on 08/08/2011 3:21:45 PM PDT by Ronin (Obamanation has replaced Bizarroworld as the most twisted place in the universe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libertarian neocon; All

I don’t understand why people are punishing companies or other investors. Business’s have plenty of money and most reports look good.

The mess is caused by the government, government overspending, governments political posturing in front of camera’s every day, etc. Seems the biggest problem we have is government and today was all about punishing private companies to show their wrath at the poorly run government we have.


10 posted on 08/08/2011 3:22:54 PM PDT by edcoil (The will to win is important, but the will to prepare is vital. -- Joe Paterno)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libertarian neocon

Obviously not, he keeps giving them.

At this point I think even the hardest-left lib is sick of listening to him (everyone else was there 2 years ago).


11 posted on 08/08/2011 3:23:02 PM PDT by icanhasbailout
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libertarian neocon
We have a leader and he is leading us to “fundamentally change America” as he promised in his inaugural address. His speech today was awful, because his political advisers correctly told him that he needed to say something. However, if he were to have presented the victory speech that he would have liked to have given, the mask of his true intentions would no longer be in doubt. He needs to keep up some appearances that he is not delighted at the downfall of the United States. We have a leader who wants to destroy our country. It is a thought that is too controversial for most to consider seriously, but we are at a time when we need to accept that as fact.
A leader who loved our country would have given a speech that inspired the country to get up, dust off, and prove that we are a great nation, no the greatest nation. Obama will never be that man and we have to decide how we are going to come to terms with a man who vowed to “fundamentally change America”.
12 posted on 08/08/2011 3:24:01 PM PDT by madinmadtown (Marx, the patron saint of blame, envy and destruction.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libertarian neocon

Even if he had the mental capabilities to realize it his army of sycophants and propaganda experts in the press would assure him of his unparallelled greatness.


13 posted on 08/08/2011 3:25:36 PM PDT by Graneros ("It is no exaggeration to say that the undecided could go one way or another.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Retired Greyhound

Always was a dolt. Remains a dolt. Never bought that “intelligent” B.S.


14 posted on 08/08/2011 3:28:49 PM PDT by oldsicilian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: libertarian neocon
obozo is a bumbling nincompoop, totally devoid of any meaningful life experience other than being pushed forward by affirmative action programs and corrupt political machinery. He's a stupid man with a huge ego. Of course, he favors redistribution of wealth; at some level, he probably understands he would starve to death in the real world were it not for government hand-outs, racial preferences, or being carried on the shoulders of con-men and crooked politicians.

THERE! I SAID IT! OBAMA IS A CON MAN WITH A BELOW AVERAGE I.Q., TRADING ON BLACK RACISM AND WHITE LIBERAL GUILT WHILE HE RUNS THE ECONOMY OVER THE CLIFF! [best impersonation of Mark Levin]

15 posted on 08/08/2011 3:29:39 PM PDT by San Jacinto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libertarian neocon

He just reads. He doesn’t pay attention to what he’s reading.


16 posted on 08/08/2011 3:30:47 PM PDT by crosshairs (If Sharia Law becomes the law of the land, heads are gonna roll.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libertarian neocon

He makes less sense than a rapper from the hood.


17 posted on 08/08/2011 3:31:42 PM PDT by Average Al
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libertarian neocon
ohno
18 posted on 08/08/2011 3:36:13 PM PDT by FrankR ("If you can't make them see the light, let them feel the heat." - R. Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libertarian neocon

It’s time to invoke the 25th...the man has NO CLUE WHATSOEVER...


19 posted on 08/08/2011 3:36:45 PM PDT by shield (Rev 2:9 Woe unto those who say they are Judahites and are not, but are of the syna GOG ue of Satan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oldsicilian
He's a moron. He's Erkel all growed up. I've raised gray squirrels that were more accomplished critical thinkers. My eight-year-old niece throws a baseball better. Much better!

Not only will Sarah Palin tear him a new one in the debates, but in a knock-down, drag-out fistfight, Palin would beat the wheezing snot out of this preening fairy.

I can barely stand to look at or listen to him long enough to grab the remote and change the channel. He's a National disgrace.

;^\

20 posted on 08/08/2011 3:44:08 PM PDT by Gargantua ("Our little pit bull says 'Taste my nightstick!',,, A barracuda in a skin-tight skirt.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson