Notice how the Bachmann supporters and even some who call themselves Palinistas do not attack the substance of the post. They attack me using ad hominems, the very tool of the left.
Sooner or later they are going to have to answer the substance of the post. It ain’t going away.
They may be making you angry but they are not accomplishing anything else.
LLS
This would be significant if and only if (that's not a malapropism on my part, either; it is a formal logical term) it had ever been claimed, or if it were generally believed, that lawyers as a group know how to write.
You would have a much more powerful post if you were to focus on the purely ethical impropriety. Your sentence
"It was none of those things that I found so egregious, because politicians typically engage in such shenanigans on a daily basis, and Michele Bachmann is nothing if not a typical politician."
is really the most damning one of all for Michele's electoral prospects, and it ought to become the topic sentence for your newly-rewritten essay.
Cheers!