Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Kaslin
Local PDs should not have SWAT units. SWAT should be a State Police unit, called in only when there is a damn good reason.

By making it a state unit, the local police wanting a SWAT raid would not only need a warrant, but also have their warrant and reasons be convincing to the SWAT commander who is not under their chain of command, and who does NOT want to be associated with a major screwup in judgement.

By making SWAT consist of a few units in the state, it would be possible to have SWAT be better trained and equipped, and also faster to deploy, since it would become cost-justifiable to give them helicopter transport.

35 posted on 06/10/2011 6:10:21 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 ("It is only when we've lost everything, that we are free to do anything" -- Fight Club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: PapaBear3625
Local PDs should not have SWAT units. SWAT should be a State Police unit, called in only when there is a damn good reason.

I wish the "real" SWAT teams--those that existed before every two-bit police department decided it needed to have one--would speak out against the proliferation of SWAT-wannabe teams. It is reasonably debatable whether there is a need for "real" SWAT teams; there is no justification, however, for many of the SWAT-wannabe teams. Not only do their tactics recklessly endanger innocent people, but they would also recklessly endanger the lives of the officers involved if their targets were anywhere near as dangerous as they claimed.

37 posted on 06/10/2011 4:39:02 PM PDT by supercat (Barry Soetoro == Bravo Sierra)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson