There are some disputes. These fall into groups of what Obama and his enablers argue and those that go with what Ben Franklin, Jay and Washington argued when the Constitution was founded.The Senate resolution giving McCain eligibility was non binding and had little if any Constitutional standing except for the purpose of setting up a challenge in case McCain won. That noted lawyers would carry the argument for such a resolution comes as no surprise. My experience with any class of lawyers is they will promote what makes them money even to arguing against other lawyers.What is really needed is a public law/declaration of what standing is and the individuals right to have such. I understand some states are looking at that issue and the sooner courts are told what individual standing means the sooner there will be meaning to the expression ‘We the People’.
Now you seem to agree that this will have to be challenged in the courts, which is my position. Obama is in the WH. McCain was on the ballot. If the definition of "natural born citizen" is so accepted and well defined by every legitimate legal authority and constitutional scholar (Tribe and Olson excepted), then why did this happen? Both political parties accepted the results.
What is really needed is a public law/declaration of what standing is and the individuals right to have such. I understand some states are looking at that issue and the sooner courts are told what individual standing means the sooner there will be meaning to the expression ‘We the People’.
Standing to do what? And would such a law be constitutional?