Skip to comments.
Indiana Sheriff wants random house searches
Mike Chirch ^
Posted on 05/16/2011 8:40:02 PM PDT by wrastu
Here it comes
Sheriff, Don Hartman Sr.
http://www.mikechurch.com/Today-s-Lead-Story/in-sheriff-if-we-need-to-conduct-random-house-to-house-searches-we-will.html
TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: banglist; bloodoftyrants; communism; corruption; cwii; cwiiping; donttreadonme; donutwatch; govtabuse; jbt; nuthouse; policestate; rapeofliberty; tyranny
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 321-333 next last
1
posted on
05/16/2011 8:40:06 PM PDT
by
wrastu
To: wrastu
This is the best reason to make sure you have a Sheriff in your county who is a strict Constitutionalist.
2
posted on
05/16/2011 8:42:49 PM PDT
by
GladesGuru
(In a society predicated upon freedom, it is essential to examine principles,)
To: wrastu
3
posted on
05/16/2011 8:43:01 PM PDT
by
ltc8k6
To: wrastu
Will they be searching other publishers as well?
4
posted on
05/16/2011 8:43:21 PM PDT
by
whatexit
Comment #5 Removed by Moderator
To: ltc8k6
The ISC says they can.
Maybe they'll change their attitude after enough random house searchers get popped for being mistaken as home invaders.
6
posted on
05/16/2011 8:44:46 PM PDT
by
aruanan
To: wrastu
If you have done nothing wrong, you have nothing to fear fellow citizen.
Besides we don’t want the terrorists and drug dealers to win, do we?
7
posted on
05/16/2011 8:45:14 PM PDT
by
Eyes Unclouded
("The word bipartisan means some larger-than-usual deception is being carried out." -George Carlin)
To: wrastu
This vile creature belongs at Gitmo with the other terrorists.
8
posted on
05/16/2011 8:45:56 PM PDT
by
montag813
To: wrastu
Wow, sounds just like former LA Mayor Richard Riordan.
9
posted on
05/16/2011 8:49:31 PM PDT
by
ElkGroveDan
(My tagline is in the shop.)
To: NWFLConservative
You called a “Stalinist tactic” quite correctly.
However, buckshot will not reliable penetrate a decent vest. And, not only will surprise be on their side, there will be several of them.
May I suggest getting together with other Conservatives and having your legislature pass laws specifically forbidding the search tactics you want made illegal.
Then your State Supreme Court can do nothing and SCOTUS will not be able to intervene either.
10
posted on
05/16/2011 8:49:36 PM PDT
by
GladesGuru
(In a society predicated upon freedom, it is essential to examine principles,)
To: wrastu
might as well,
the constitution has been hijacked and flown into the ground
we live in a fascist oligarchy now, no longer a representative republic
11
posted on
05/16/2011 8:49:41 PM PDT
by
KTM rider
( patriot turned rebel)
To: wrastu
The police are clearly no longer our friends.
To: wrastu
Fourth Amendment to the US constitution:
"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized".Governor Daniels, you will be judged on this and only this.
13
posted on
05/16/2011 8:51:25 PM PDT
by
RC one
(DO NOT RAISE THE DEBT LIMIT!)
To: ltc8k6
The ISC says they can. Is that really what they said?
14
posted on
05/16/2011 8:52:17 PM PDT
by
Moonman62
(The US has become a government with a country, rather than a country with a government.)
To: GladesGuru
...May I suggest getting together with other Conservatives and having your legislature pass laws specifically forbidding the search tactics you want made illegal....
I guess you didnt read the Indiana Supreme court decision...you cannot stop any unlawful search by police...so a law would be useless....
To: NWFLConservative
CZ52.If you're in a one person household, and don't have any neighbors or pets you care about. You can get one of the above.
16
posted on
05/16/2011 8:53:18 PM PDT
by
Stentor
( "All cults of personality begin as high drama and end as low comedy.")
To: NWFLConservative
This sherriff is talking like target practice.
;^]
17
posted on
05/16/2011 8:54:45 PM PDT
by
Gargantua
(Palin 2012 ~ "Going Oval")
To: wrastu
To: NWFLConservative
19
posted on
05/16/2011 8:58:43 PM PDT
by
EdReform
(Oath Keepers - Guardians of the Republic - Honor your oath - Join us: www.oathkeepers.org)
To: Moonman62
They can make an illegal entry, and you can’t do anything about it until after the fact. Assuming you can afford the legal bills to argue about it in court.
So yeah, they can randomly enter your house, and it’s illegal for you to interfere.
20
posted on
05/16/2011 8:58:48 PM PDT
by
ltc8k6
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 321-333 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson