[jda]

I have noticed that evolutionary religious zealots have started to bend the dialogue (much like their global warming religious zealots - or, maybe they're one and the saem). It used to be that small changes within species, which are easily observable and part of their design, was called adaption. They are now trying to call such changes "evolution" in an attempt to "prove" the theory of evolution. It might work on some mind-numbed parrots, which is what they're counting on, but the vast majority of intelligent people see through the smoke.

I posted the following on March 1:

A quick test for evolutionary religious zealots:

- How many DNA pairs are in the human genome?
- How many of those human DNA pairs differ from those of a chimp?
- How long would it take for a human to evolve from a chimp, assuming the necessary DNA mutations take place in exactly the right sequence, without any mistakes, and at the rate that is survivable.

Still not a single response!

[wintertime]

A quick test for evolutionary religious zealots:
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

My test:

*** How much do they support compulsory government schooling?

*** Do they agree that behind every compulsory government schooling law stands armed police ready to enforce that law?

** Are they willing to use the threat of armed police action to impose their worldview on other people’s children by means of police threat?

** Do they accept that it is impossible to have a neutral education and that the teaching of evolution ( or not teaching it) has religious, cultural, and political consequences that are NOT neutral?