Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: GeronL

Exactly right.

Not to mention the way it attempts to completely shift the burden for SS/M entirely onto the rich. I say “attempts” because the rich would flee the country since the FairTax gives them that legal option. The rich spending their money elsewhere would leave a $500B/yr hole in the “projected” FT revenues. That fact alone guarantees the FairTax rate would need to be much higher than 23%.


16 posted on 04/19/2011 1:34:20 AM PDT by Kellis91789 (There's a reason the mascot of the Democratic Party is a jackass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: Kellis91789
I say “attempts” because the rich would flee the country since the FairTax gives them that legal option.

The "rich" however defined have been fleeing the country for decades as the overall income tax burden has increased. They will return with The Fair Tax since their productivity will no longer be taxed.
19 posted on 04/19/2011 12:33:58 PM PDT by Defend Liberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson