Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Methane and the greenhouse-gas footprint of natural gas from shale formations

The above link goes to the abstract from Howarth et al.

Studies Say Natural Gas Has Its Own Environmental Problems (Barf alert!)

The last link is the NY Times version of the story.

1 posted on 04/16/2011 12:58:05 AM PDT by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: neverdem
Both the study, and the article, are filled with contradictions. All of this is part of a pattern of increasing attacks on fracking shale for natural gas that have appeared following new estimates of its abundant availability. ("Energy Crisis? - Nope - Plenty of Time to Develop Third Generation Helium-3-Fed Fusion"). Some Malthusians even "speculated" harvesting shale for natural gas in North Dakota "could have" caused the Japan's earthquake and subsequent tsunami. (Fraking "could" kill!).

The agenda of these elites is government subsidies of every kind and, rationalizing it all, fundamentally anti-human self-loathing.

2 posted on 04/16/2011 1:38:52 AM PDT by Prospero (non est ad astra mollis e terris via)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

The NYS legislature has shut down fracking in NYS. Cornell gets tons of Grant money.


3 posted on 04/16/2011 1:46:15 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
In the calculus of global warming,

every equation is divided by zero.

7 posted on 04/16/2011 2:40:37 AM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

The left ought to be concerned more with the disaster of ethanol than the gas from shale issue. Ethanol’s burn emission is far worse and its energy quotient is less. Lose lose from the left.

LOL! Maybe we should start the ad campaign....Liberals? LOSING!


9 posted on 04/16/2011 4:11:06 AM PDT by ICE-FLYER (God bless and keep the United States of America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
"The main author is an evolutionary biologist and an anti-natural-gas activist who is not credentialled to do this kind of chemical analysis."

Amazing. One would think that a biologist would be aware of the carbon basis of all life, and have encountered some discussion of the carbon cycle along the way.

What I would like to see are some studies determining the minimum concentration of carbon dioxide that plants can extract from the air. When carbon dioxide drops to that minimum level, the total mass of plant life will drop so that the minimum level will be maintained. When plant biomass decreases, animal biomass will necessarily decrease.

The Earth itself is sequestering carbon dioxide and has been throughout its history; do we really, out of stupid fear of "global warming", want to hasten that process?

12 posted on 04/16/2011 4:40:12 AM PDT by exDemMom (Now that I've finally accepted that I'm living a bad hair life, I'm more at peace with the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dr. Bogus Pachysandra; Normandy; FreedomPoster; Para-Ord.45; Entrepreneur; tubebender; mmanager; ...
 


Beam me to Planet Gore !

14 posted on 04/16/2011 4:53:01 AM PDT by steelyourfaith (If it's "green" ... it's crap.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson