Skip to comments.
Rep. Pelosi: “Elections Shouldn’t Matter as Much as They Do”
http://annem040359.wordpress.com/ ^
| April 13, 2011
| annem040359
Posted on 04/13/2011 6:11:37 PM PDT by Biggirl
Shes back again!!!!
Good grief, is there NOT a video camera in which she does not look for? Former USA Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, (D/CA), on a visit to Tufts University in MA for this conference which is captured in this video.
What she said comes as no surprise. She is one big supporter of a one party system of governing and she asks Republicans to take their party back from the tea party movement.
Oh Rep. Nancy, would it surprise you if one of the REASONS why your party LOST BIG last November was because people were just fed upwith being forced-fed your vision?
(Excerpt) Read more at annem040359.wordpress.com ...
TOPICS: Government; Politics; Society
KEYWORDS: ca; pelosi; tufts
Rep. Pelosi has not met a video camera she has not liked.
1
posted on
04/13/2011 6:11:39 PM PDT
by
Biggirl
To: Biggirl
Rep. Pelosi has not met a video camera she has not liked. Unfortunately it doesn't go both ways. Ewwwww
2
posted on
04/13/2011 6:16:11 PM PDT
by
tsowellfan
(http://www.cafenetamerica.com)
To: Biggirl
Actually, since Reagan I don’t see where elections have mattered much. The Republicans ask before they nail you, then nail you no matter what your reply is. The dems just jam it in there.
3
posted on
04/13/2011 6:21:38 PM PDT
by
mark3681
To: Biggirl
I hate to say this, but Pelosi is right. Both parties should govern within the limits of the enumerated powers in the Constitution. If they did that, it would matter very little who won an election because both parties would govern well.
4
posted on
04/13/2011 6:24:23 PM PDT
by
Pollster1
(Natural born citizen of the USA, with the birth certificate to prove it)
To: Pollster1
Unfortunately, the Pelosi corollary is that the Constitution doesn’t matter, either.
To: Biggirl
Yeah, Nancy, let’s get rid of those persky elections, especially since no one wants to vote for Democrats anymore.
6
posted on
04/13/2011 6:32:58 PM PDT
by
Fido969
To: Pollster1
You are correct. They shouldn’d...and wouldn't if there were term limits. This would prevent incumbents from using taxpayer money in ways to prolong their stay in power without regard to the long term consequences. This assumes they have a conscience at all.
7
posted on
04/13/2011 6:33:35 PM PDT
by
johnandrhonda
(have you hugged your banjo today?)
To: Biggirl
8
posted on
04/13/2011 7:09:27 PM PDT
by
Hardraade
(I want gigaton warheads now!!)
To: Biggirl
Well, maybe if we had two pro-Constitution parties. Instead we have one actively anti-Constitution party and one apathetic party.
9
posted on
04/13/2011 7:47:04 PM PDT
by
KarlInOhio
(Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice! Tea Party extremism is a badge of honor.)
To: Biggirl
I cannot believe we have idiots like these running our lives.
Thanks again San Fransisco for cursing this country over and over again with this insane woman.
To: ari-freedom
In the long run, the Constitution matters. It will be ugly if we have to go there, again, but it will matter.
11
posted on
04/14/2011 6:59:51 AM PDT
by
Pollster1
(Natural born citizen of the USA, with the birth certificate to prove it)
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson