Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ask Dr. Helen: Should Prince William Wear a Wedding Ring?
Pajamas Media ^ | April 5, 2011 | Helen Smith

Posted on 04/05/2011 5:44:23 AM PDT by Kaslin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last
To: Kaslin

Does it matter? Everyone but the dead on earth will know he’s married!


21 posted on 04/05/2011 7:18:15 AM PDT by mancini
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fletcher J
Sooner or later, modern-thinking Brits will decide to do away with the expense of the royalty

One can argue that the royal family are a source of revenue. They cost about $60 million a year. Tourism is about $122 billion a year.

If the Windsors account for even half of one percent of those tourism revenues, they've paid their way.

Also, the Crown Estate is theoretically the property of the royal family (though not the property of any specific monarch) and it contributes about $350 million a year to the treasury.

22 posted on 04/05/2011 7:20:25 AM PDT by wideawake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: wideawake

I’ve heard the argument that the royal family are ultimately a source of revenue. I wouldn’t know enough to argue either way, but I wouldn’t doubt it.

However, the royal’s draw is still based on the tourist’s appreciation of centuries-old traditions. Could the US establish a royal family today and enjoy the same tourism benfit? Obviously not; a week-old monarchy would be a joke, even if a super-cool person like myself were made honorary king of the USA.

Like I said, it’s not my business what the Windsors do; I just think it’s not a good move for them to shun English tradition, since they represent England and that’s ultimately what keeps the money flowing their way.


23 posted on 04/05/2011 7:48:02 AM PDT by Fletcher J
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

When I see men who work with their hands, I tell them they shouldn’t wear rings at work. The new carbide rings make me shudder, the can’t be cut off with traditional ring cutters.


24 posted on 04/05/2011 7:53:17 AM PDT by dangerdoc (see post #6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fletcher J
I completely agree with you. The trappings of tradition are the core of the franchise.
25 posted on 04/05/2011 7:54:27 AM PDT by wideawake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
men are..servants who exist to serve women’s needs and desires

That's me all over, baby.

26 posted on 04/05/2011 7:56:55 AM PDT by laotzu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: verga

Same.

I stopped wearing my ring after I saw a man’s finger ruined when he was jumping out of the back of an LMTV and it got caught. Bent the ring down into a cutting edge.


27 posted on 04/05/2011 8:13:32 AM PDT by Domalais
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix

I have the same problem with my fingers swelling up, so I have stopped wearing any rings.


28 posted on 04/05/2011 8:13:46 AM PDT by Kaslin (Acronym for OBAMA: One Big Ass Mistake America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: dangerdoc
The new carbide rings make me shudder, the can’t be cut off with traditional ring cutters.

Most EMTs carry jewelry saws in their emergency vehicles for precisely this purpose. Also, carbide rings can be cracked.

29 posted on 04/05/2011 8:24:48 AM PDT by wideawake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: wideawake

I’m no expert, but maybe the rings were used in the wedding ceremony, but not traditionally worn by men on a daily basis afterwords?


30 posted on 04/05/2011 8:33:03 AM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: wideawake

Our ring cutters have carbide blades, not much use on carbide rings. Just how do you crack a carbide ring without injuring the finger? This is a real question because it is only a matter of time before I will have to do it.


31 posted on 04/05/2011 8:38:07 AM PDT by dangerdoc (see post #6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Helen draws a false parallel, IMO. Surely the female version of whether or not to wear a wedding ring is-—whether or not she wears a wedding ring. They can do it both or either as an obligation and obligatory symbol or as a choice and an option. If it’s an option and she wants to but he doesn’t, so be it—but it seems very much to be the couple’s choice.


32 posted on 04/05/2011 8:46:00 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dangerdoc
Our ring cutters have carbide blades, not much use on carbide rings

Jewelers' saws have industrial diamond blades.

Just how do you crack a carbide ring without injuring the finger?

A vise has been used in some cases. Cracking is apparently more dangerous for the eyes than the finger. I have no direct firsthand knowledge of the vise technique.

33 posted on 04/05/2011 8:48:16 AM PDT by wideawake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: wideawake

OK, I googled it and see there are instructions on cracking a carbide ring. I just need to buy a vice grip to leave at work and hope that the technique works when I try it.

I heard about another emergency room that had a deal with a local dentist who would cut off the rings with his diamond drill.


34 posted on 04/05/2011 8:51:37 AM PDT by dangerdoc (see post #6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman
I’m no expert, but maybe the rings were used in the wedding ceremony, but not traditionally worn by men on a daily basis afterwords?

The Book of Common Prayer was largely written for a pretty wealthy stratum of society.

I would guess that a sizeable percentage of the population simply could not afford wedding rings.

But I would expect that those Anglicans who could afford them wore them.

I would also expect that Nonconformists (i.e. Calvinists, Puritans, Quakers, etc.) who rejected the Prayer Book would have eschewed such rings as part of a hated ritual.

I would also point out that until the heyday of George Brummell in the 1810s, men generally wore quite a bit of jewelry. It was due to Brummell's influence as an arbiter of fashion that jewelry for men became uncommon.

35 posted on 04/05/2011 9:23:25 AM PDT by wideawake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: dangerdoc
OK, I googled it and see there are instructions on cracking a carbide ring. I just need to buy a vice grip to leave at work and hope that the technique works when I try it.

Could you post a link? Thanks

36 posted on 04/05/2011 11:06:33 AM PDT by verga (I am not an apologist, I just play one on Television)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: verga

http://www.titanium-jewelry.com/about-tungsten.html


37 posted on 04/05/2011 12:23:55 PM PDT by dangerdoc (see post #6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Domalais; verga

Yep, rings are clearly a needless harzard when working construction and similar activities. My father never wore his ring while on the job.

I worked with a guy that hopped out of the back of a pickup truck one weekend; something caught his ring and it peeled all the flesh off his finger - turned it inside out, basically. He had a larege, wierd bandage with metal wires running thru his finger, for a long time. It healed well enough for him to keep his finger, but with limited mobility.


38 posted on 04/06/2011 8:54:33 AM PDT by Fletcher J
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson