[patlin]

Nope, no language there saying that the candidates nominated are qualified/eligible under the provisions Article II of the Constitution of the United States

[himno hero]

Americans were “hornswoggled” by the signatures on the nomination.

[Just A Nobody]

Nope, no language there saying that the candidates nominated are qualified/eligible under the provisions Article II of the Constitution of the United States

Not on yours, but on the one for Hawaii it says:

... are legally qualified to serve under the provisions of the United States Constitution.

[MagnoliaB]

Are you saying that this Certificate of Nomination overrides what the Constitution of the United States of America says are the requirements for POTUS?

Who vetted Obama?

What where the findings?

What Republicans let this go forward? If everything wasn't proper?

[bluecat6]

Nope, no language there saying that the candidates nominated are qualified/eligible under the provisions Article II of the Constitution of the United States

______________________________________________________________________________

There were 2 documents created.

See here:

http://www.scribd.com/doc/30784035/DNC-Chairperson-Nancy-Pelosi-Issued-Signed-Two-Different-Certification-Forms-for-Obama-in-2008

Why?

Many, many states require the state party to confirm the Constitutional eligibility of their Presidential and Vice Presidential candidates. Hawaii is included in that. But Hawaii also has a provision to allow the National Party to submit the candidates for the ballot AND allow the CEO the discretion to make the final decision on which one to use if needed. It was needed in 2008. The local party, headed by now Lt. Gov. Brian Schatz did not submit the normal candidate declaration. They omitted the constitutional language! The document was legally worthless. So Ms. Pelosi and the DNC had to modify their usual document to include the legally required declaration of constitutional eligibility. That is what got Obama and Biden on the ticket in Hawaii in 2008. The local guys REFUSED to confirm their constitutionally eligibility!

Here is a good account of the likely events.

http://thedailypen.blogspot.com/2011/01/o-con-had-legal-help-from-non-partisan.html

BTW, every state has different laws. Some even knowingly allow ineligible candidates to be on the ballot. Hawaii has one of the more strict laws and does require the statement of constitutional eligibility and Brian Schatz, native Hawaiian, graduate of the same high school as Barak Obama, current Lt. Gov. REFUSED to confirm the eligibility.

In poker that is called ‘a tell’.

[Cheerio]

There is a fraud here - see this story by the non-lame stream media. Two certificates were issued - pay close attention to the alteration in the opening paragraph.

BORN IN THE USA? Eye-popper: Is Nancy Pelosi in on eligibility cover-up?

"The second form obtained by Williams appears identical, down to a typographical error in "through." But in this one, the verification of eligibility under the requirements of the U.S. Constitution is gone. "