Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

I would love to dabate this professor in front of his students! He is a thorn to the founders original intent and frequently testifies in Congress. Most recently regarding Rand Paul's erroneous attempt to amend the birthright citizenship laws.
1 posted on 03/25/2011 1:53:48 PM PDT by patlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: bushpilot1; STARWISE; rxsid; Red Steel; edge919; Spaulding; Danae; Fred Nerks; Beckwith; ...
"PING" Lib Prof. Spiro strikes again
2 posted on 03/25/2011 1:56:09 PM PDT by patlin (Ignorance is Bliss for those who choose to wear rose colored glasses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: patlin
However, Spiro said, "there's no evidence that an individual has to be born to U.S. citizens to be eligible for the presidency."

Obviously, this guy hasn't read the constitution. If he has, then he most definitely doesn't have enough reading comprehension ability to be a professor.

Oh, but I forgot. . .in U.S. universities, the only requirement for professorship is flaming liberalism.

3 posted on 03/25/2011 2:16:38 PM PDT by MEGoody (Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: patlin

Beyond Citizenship
American Identity After Globalization
Peter J. Spiro

http://www.oup.com/us/catalog/general/subject/Law/ComparativeLawandNationalLegalSy/?view=usa&ci=9780195152180

Description
American identity has always been capacious as a concept but narrow in its application. Citizenship has mostly been about being here, either through birth or residence. The territorial premises for citizenship have worked to resolve the peculiar challenges of American identity. But globalization is detaching identity from location. What used to define American was rooted in American space. Now one can be anywhere and be an American, politically or culturally. Against that backdrop, it becomes difficult to draw the boundaries of human community in a meaningful way. Longstanding notions of democratic citizenship are becoming obsolete, even as we cling to them. Beyond Citizenship charts the trajectory of American citizenship and shows how American identity is unsustainable in the face of globalization.

Peter J. Spiro describes how citizenship law once reflected and shaped the American national character. Spiro explores the histories of birthright citizenship, naturalization, dual citizenship, and how those legal regimes helped reinforce an otherwise fragile national identity. But on a shifting global landscape, citizenship status has become increasingly divorced from any sense of actual community on the ground. As the bonds of citizenship dissipate, membership in the nation-state becomes less meaningful. The rights and obligations distinctive to citizenship are now trivial. Naturalization requirements have been relaxed, dual citizenship embraced, and territorial birthright citizenship entrenched—developments that are all irreversible. Loyalties, meanwhile, are moving to transnational communities defined in many different ways: by race, ethnicity, gender, religion, age, and sexual orientation. These communities, Spiro boldly argues, are replacing bonds that once connected people to the nation-state, with profound implications for the future of governance.

Learned, incisive, and sweeping in scope, Beyond Citizenship offers a provocative look at how globalization is changing the very definition of who we are and where we belong.


4 posted on 03/25/2011 2:23:08 PM PDT by Fred Nerks (FAIR DINKUM!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: patlin
The proposed legislation on documentation requirements for candidates asks for information on the citizenship of a candidate's parents. Tea party backers said Wednesday they believe people are only natural-born citizens if their parents are citizens.

The Arizona legislature does not get to define what a natural-born citizen is.

5 posted on 03/25/2011 2:24:40 PM PDT by K-Stater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: patlin

He obviously does not believe in “original intent.” In fact he appears to be asserting that he is more authoritative than
Chief Justice John Marshall, Justice Story, St. George Tucker and Chief Justice Waite, as well as the principal author of the Fourteenth Amendment. Such learning! Such wisdom! Aren’t we glad he’s teaching young minds? /s


16 posted on 03/25/2011 3:51:04 PM PDT by AmericanVictory (Should we be more like them or they more like we used to be?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: patlin

you all have to see this video ..

AMAZING .. simple enough for a kid to understand

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JCmpyQO6bbw&NR=1&feature=fvwp


22 posted on 03/26/2011 2:38:20 AM PDT by Munz (All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson