So was Clinton...We all remembered how THAT turned out.
So your point is?
So was Clinton...We all remembered how THAT turned out. So your point is? ... Wingy
Your rebuttal, Wingy, is a non sequitur as it relates to the tin-foil hat conspiracy theory advocated by this thread.
It is claimed that Sarah Palin was picked by John McCain so that she could "then be torn down".
It has been pointed out that it is beyond ridiculous to claim that a total unknown was "picked" so that the total unknown could then be "torn down" for four years.
The point of this thread is as ludicrous as claiming that Conservatives "picked" unknown Bill Clinton as a Presidential nominee so that those same Conservatives could then spend years "tearing Bill Clinton down.".
That does not makes sense to anybody that does not have several screws loose.