Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: jcsjcm
This one is the close to Detroit (and the second closest to me)

Fermi 2
Plant Operator: DTE Energy
Oldest reactor on site: 25 years old
Same containment system as the Fukushima Daiichi plant in Japan

I guess it sucks to be Detroit ... but then that goes without saying every day.

9 posted on 03/18/2011 2:15:58 PM PDT by KarlInOhio (Washington is finally rid of the Kennedies. Free at last, thank God almighty we are free at last.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: KarlInOhio

Same containment system as the Fukushima Daiichi plant in Japan

“I guess it sucks to be Detroit ... but then that goes without saying every day.”

Wonder what the odds are that Detroit’s plant will get hit with the largest quake in history and then have it’s backup generator washed out to sea by one of the worst Tsunamis in history? Barring that, they will probably be OK.


37 posted on 03/18/2011 2:30:16 PM PDT by jessduntno ("That 3 a.m. phone call from Egypt to Obama went right to the answering machine." - Sarah Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: KarlInOhio

Is Detroit in a Tsunami zone? Then they have very little to worry about. Fukushima withstood the earthquake, 7 times greater than what it was designed to withstand. It was the tsunami that doomed it.


70 posted on 03/18/2011 3:33:19 PM PDT by Tatze (I reject your reality and substitute my own!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: KarlInOhio

I’m cool with Fermi being nearby.


78 posted on 03/18/2011 4:06:22 PM PDT by Larry Lucido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: KarlInOhio
In between Fermi and Davis Besse.

One that is like Fukushima and one (DB) that FE put the hole in it's Rx head.

I've worked at both in the past and I'm not worried.

We must either select Nuclear Power or Coal as our primary base load. We can't abandon both. Actually I prefer both.

Natural Gas is a fuel of convenience and should be reserved for home/commercial/institutional heating and possibly as an alternative vehicle fuel (in liquefied form). Why waste easy fuel on power generation at a stationary generator staffed by people who can deal with the more difficult fuels we have here on earth?

79 posted on 03/18/2011 4:09:29 PM PDT by SteamShovel ("Does the noise in my head bother you?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson