Posted on 03/04/2011 7:04:56 AM PST by Academiadotorg
The way in which we view art is turning out to be another means by which right and left divide. Both the highbrow among us who are searching for beauty and the lowbrow, such as your servant, who like pretty shiny things, are at odds with savants who tell us we are missing the point.
Unfortunately, these elites also bring to mind the observation of the late, great Redd Foxx as his alter ego Fred Sanford: “Beauty may only be skin deep but ugly goes straight to the bone.” “For us as radical teachers, what is most important is less a work’s entitlement to the hallowed label of ‘art’ than its social uses,” Linda Dittmar and Joseph Entin write in the latest issue of Radical Teacher, “a socialist, feminist, and anti-racist journal on the theory and practice of teaching.”
Entin teaches English and American Studies at Brooklyn College. Dittmar recently retired from teaching literature and film studies at the University of Massachusetts in Boston.
You may not want to see what they like. “Examples of art censored or suppressed abound,” they write. “A tacky sculpture of the Ten Commandments (tablets) or a crudely made statue of Jesus can be erected obtrusively in pulbic spaces while Andres Serrano’s visually mesmerizing and indeed reverent photograph, “Piss Christ” (1987) came under sever attack for bathing a plastic crucifix in the yellow glow of the body’s natural fluid.” Indeed it did, although, as the old joke goes, not only has Serrano’s reverence never been questioned, it has never even been mentioned.
Malcolm A. Kline is the Executive Director of Accuracy in Academia.
If you would like to comment on this article, e-mail mal.kline@academia.org
ping for later
Esther! This Louisville Slugger is going to knock you out!!
b
Yes, I do believe that’s “visually mesmerizing and indeed reverent”, but it’s not Christ, even though he may think that’s what he is.
If you find a picture of Christ in a jar of “the body’s golden fluid” to be “reverent,” then you’ll love the fact that I’ve applied some “rectal peanut butter” to your scone, and augmented your Perrier with some of that same glorious fluid.
No need to thank me.
Ugh. Don’t pollute urine. It has uses. Barry otoh....not so much.
The gulf is between the modern intellectual elite of today's culture who possess a malevolent sense of life with its hatred of man and existence which leads to cynicism, pessimism, and despair plus the altruist-collectivist mentality, which leads to force and violation of rights, and the people who possess a benevolent sense of life, plus the egoistic-individualistic mentality, which leads to the preference for optimism and Romanticism in art and the ability to reject the irrational ideas of the elite.
Modern art is is a reflection on our society in general. In the dumper, ugly, shocking, anti-beauty, revolting. How sad the art, that is being promoted today, by the so called experts.
Modern art is about your bigography.
If you are a rabid, America-hating black Lesbian, everything you produce is “art”.
If you are a Christian housewife from Ohio who paints like one of the Masters, you are not an artist.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.