Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Whenifhow

It is time to call a con-con of the 34 most conservative states and put an end to this Federal Insanity. There is no other way.


2 posted on 12/24/2010 12:44:04 PM PST by screaminsunshine (Americanism vs Communism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: screaminsunshine

Hell, he never was a Republican.

The left is throwing us curves.


8 posted on 12/24/2010 12:48:26 PM PST by TribalPrincess2U (demonicRATS= Obama's Mosque, taxes, painful death. Is this what you want?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: screaminsunshine

Hell, he never was a Republican.

The left is throwing us curves.


9 posted on 12/24/2010 12:48:26 PM PST by TribalPrincess2U (demonicRATS= Obama's Mosque, taxes, painful death. Is this what you want?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: screaminsunshine

I like this approach:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_of_Federalism


14 posted on 12/24/2010 12:52:58 PM PST by SC_Pete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: screaminsunshine

While an excellent argument can be made for term limits (which, along with elimination of the fat pensions, perks and LAME DUCK SESSIONS I favor), I would offer that, currently, our chances of getting them are somewhere between slim and none. The sad fact that we are even discussing them is a manifestation of the even sadder fact that, until recently, Americans have grown complacently inattentive to the actions of and abuses by government at all levels. The phrase “Let George do it” springs to mind. More folks know the names of the characters on “Lost” and “Dancing With The Stars” than know who allegedly “represents” them in the House.

Having said that, I must respectfully disagree with calls for a Constitutional Convention. I do so for the same reasons I joined with others to repel the push for a ConCon during the Carter maladministration.

Please recall that the FIRST ConCon was convened to REVISE the Articles of Confederation and, while it produced a radically different – and arguably superior – national charter, the problem to which I referred at the top would almost certainly lead to a loss of even more of the freedoms too many of us now take for granted.

A second ConCon would be populated by current political elites who have been selected BY their fellow political elites. Think Chuck Schumer, Barney Frank, Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, John Kerry, Fortney “Pete” Stark, etc. Be afraid. Be VERY AFRAID!

Unfortunately for us and our liberties, General Washington, Messers. Madison, Franklin, Adams, Sherman and the others will not be there this time. Once in session, THERE WOULD BE NO PRACTICAL WAY TO CONTROL THEM.

But, say you, the PEOPLE would have to ratify any such actions. Please recall that, today, these would be the same people who gave us Barrack Obama and hundreds of “progressives” on Capitol Hill in 2008.

Yes, 2010 WAS a course change and, no, I’m not giving up on the people. In our system, they should, within Constitutional constraints, have the last word.

Mr. Jefferson’s advice in that area comes to mind:
“I know of no safe depository of the ultimate powers of the society but the people themselves; and if we think them not enlightened enough to exercise their control with a wholesome discretion, the remedy is not to take it from them but to inform their discretion.”

Those of us who wish to save this nation and return it to a condition the Founders would again recognize must continue to “…inform their discretion.”

Dick Bachert


25 posted on 12/24/2010 1:17:01 PM PST by Dick Bachert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: screaminsunshine

Why? We already have a perfectly good Constitution that nobody pays attention to.


29 posted on 12/24/2010 1:22:18 PM PST by NTHockey (Rules of engagement #1: Take no prisoners)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: screaminsunshine

The list is long and if the GOP don’t start growing balls we might have to show them what balls mean


52 posted on 12/25/2010 8:58:27 AM PST by ronnie raygun (V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson