Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 10/24/2010 11:55:26 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: 2ndDivisionVet

Right....she should be waaaayyy above him!


2 posted on 10/24/2010 11:57:27 AM PDT by jennings2004 ((Sarah Palin: "The bright light at the end of a very dark tunnel!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Ugh, ‘equal footing’? 2DV he ain’t even fit to touch her pumps.


3 posted on 10/24/2010 11:57:42 AM PDT by ReneeLynn (Socialism is SO yesterday. Fascism, it*s the new black. Mmm Mmm Mmm.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Gotta love the Biden picture, though. Geez, what a freaking hairball. Or a plugzball.


4 posted on 10/24/2010 12:01:08 PM PDT by Attention Surplus Disorder ("No longer can we make no mistake for too long". Barack d****it 0bama, 2009, 2010, 2011.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Drudge is just previewing what his page will look like on the eve of the ‘12 presidential vote.
6 posted on 10/24/2010 12:02:22 PM PDT by JPG (Sarah Palin says: "Buck-up or get out of the truck.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
2nd, I woke up this morning and turned on the groove tube and the Today Show was on. I was still trying to wake up so I watched a little of it.

What I found most interesting is that they were doing a story on our _resident Idiot and they kept flashing back and forth between zero and clips of Sarah. I thought: "What the hell?! I thought she was a nonentity? So why are they throwing her in the same story as zero?"

They are so damned afraid of her. (And they SHOULD be!

7 posted on 10/24/2010 12:02:32 PM PDT by misharu (US Congress = children without adult supervision.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

9 posted on 10/24/2010 12:04:33 PM PDT by RushingWater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

His is a POS usurper. Some idiots here on FR want to give him a pass on that.


10 posted on 10/24/2010 12:04:51 PM PDT by Frantzie (Imam Ob*m* & Democrats support the VICTORY MOSQUE & TV supports Imam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Get’ em, SarahCuda.


11 posted on 10/24/2010 12:04:56 PM PDT by combat_boots (The Lion of Judah cometh. Hallelujah. Gloria Patri, Filio et Spiritui Sancto.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Biden could fill in for Jack Nicholson if a remake is done of The Shining or in the production of another Batman sequel.


12 posted on 10/24/2010 12:08:56 PM PDT by arasina (So there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

We have a president now? When did it become legal?


13 posted on 10/24/2010 12:10:13 PM PDT by jafojeffsurf ( Return to the Constitution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Sarah’s running; she just hasn’t declared yet. The rules change once she declares, don’t they? In the meantime, she can “host” a ton of rallies and get all kinds of support.


15 posted on 10/24/2010 12:16:07 PM PDT by janereinheimer ((I can do all things through Him who strengthens me.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

because anyone with half a brain knows that she is the defacto Republican challenger in 2012.


17 posted on 10/24/2010 12:19:54 PM PDT by TexasFreeper2009 (Obama = Epic Fail)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

But wait a minute, why isn’t Obama pitted against Mitt Romney? Or, ahem, Mitch Daniels? Or Kathleen Parker’s candidate? Or the Huckster? Or Pawlenty? Or (enter the beltway’s latest candidate du jour)? Could it be that nobody knows (or cares) what those guys are doing?

It’s not what they are doing that isn’t the problem per say, it’s what they ‘failed’ to do from the beginning that Sarah so smartly did and didn’t “retreat on’!

When the Tea Party and grassroots movement were rising last year, Sarah immediately embraced it, while the others were too chicken to decide whether it was a good idea, when the MSM went out and attacked the Tea Party as racist , Sarah defended them, while the others were tepid & cautious at times

When the heat of the battle over HealthCare arose, She took the mocking and insults over her rightly describing Death Panels in the bill....Mitt was nonexistence as well as a few who are thinking about running.

And the list goes on....Gulf Oil Crisis, Arizona illegal immigration bill, Stimulus...etc

Sarah knows that the people will reward & trust someone for not being afraid and standing with the people....

people trust someone as a leader who is willing to stand in the front of the line taking the arrows with them than to have someone who stand behind everyone waiting after the victory to proclaim that they have arrived to saved the day.


23 posted on 10/24/2010 1:02:01 PM PDT by Bigtigermike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

a foretelling of the final push in the 2012 election? hmm.


24 posted on 10/24/2010 1:03:48 PM PDT by tioga
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

She’s hotter, smarter, better educated, faster on her feet, more authoritative, a better speaker, better campaigner, and did I mention HOTTER!!!?


25 posted on 10/24/2010 1:10:40 PM PDT by Doc Savage (SOBAMP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Yup! It’s beginning to look a lot like 2012!


28 posted on 10/24/2010 1:43:57 PM PDT by Palladin ("Congress--YOU'RE FIRED!!!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

You meant to say the “putative” President. By the way, if Obama is found to be constitutionally ineligible, and Biden and Pelosi guilty of conspiracy to commit fraud, and Juan McCain not elegible either, Sarah Palin would become de facto President. Wouldn’t that be a rebuke to all those demonrats that and leftist elites who said Palin was not “qualified” to be President.


32 posted on 10/24/2010 1:59:18 PM PDT by Hotlanta Mike (Dems Guilty of Crimes against the Constitution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson