Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: pennyfarmer; LucyT; Fred Nerks; null and void; stockpirate; PhilDragoo; Candor7; rxsid; ...

Ping...........

Workable links in #3.

Sorry about repeating the ping.


13 posted on 10/12/2010 12:59:16 PM PDT by melancholy (It ain't Camelot, it's Scam-a-lot!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: melancholy; pennyfarmer; LucyT; Fred Nerks; null and void; stockpirate; PhilDragoo; Candor7; ...
Of course, Barack Hussein Obama, Jr. is not a "Natural Born Citizen." We knew that in 2006. BHO, Jr., a name he may be using legally, or illegally, admitted as much in a debate with Alan Keyes. He said, and I paraphrase here, not quote, "I don't have to be a Natural Born Citizen to run for the Senate."

Of course, he was correct. One however, does have to be a US Citizen. So this started the whole "born in Hawaii," deal. It is a brilliant smokescreen and has been tremendously successful. It night ... just might ... be true, too. But "Native Born" citizenship does not = "Natural Born Citizenship."

The entire GOP fell down on this point. Me? I blame George Bush. It was ultimately his responsibility to defend COTUS from fake POTUS candidates. Now, 2 years later, an ineligible candidate has (a) been certified to appear on the ballots of 50 states, (b) has won the popular vote, (c) has secured the vote of the Electoral College, (d) been sworn in by the SCOTUS (e) and sitteth on the throne whence he judges the living and the dead.

He is the sitting POTUS. He was ineligible to run for the office, but now occupies it.

What can we do about it? The amended Constitution says that a Federal Officer's bona fides can be ascertained by seeking a Writ of Quo Warranto, which can be sought ONLY in the Federal District Court of Washington, DC. Whatever the outcome of that case, it will be appealed. If (i.e. IF) the SCOTUS (now influenced by the staffs of 2 Marxist lesbians) finds him ineligible, they cannot remove him. That can only be done by Impeachment in the House, Conviction in the Senate, a finding of "incompetence" by the Congress, or by the unlikely event of resignation. I don't even want to think about the consequences of the SCOTUS finding him ELIGIBLE! That is possible, you know?

The application for a Writ of Quo Warranto has not yet been accepted, much less heard. In the meantime, there is no EFFECTIVE Program, Plan, or Leader to hold the POTUS in check while the legalities play out. We'll have the House. BFD. He'll have the Senate and the power and our economiuc decline will continue.

Needed: One State Legislature, 1 Governor, to keep Obama off any 2012 ballot in any state on the grounds of constitutional ineligibility. Let's hope that (a) we find a decent candidate, and (b) the scandal caused would damage the Clinton-Soros team enough to cause them to lose.

The endlessly interesting eligibility debates are in a certain sense, a waste of bloody time. We need to focus on exactly what it is the elected Republicans in the House intend to do with the power they will receive from the voters in 2010. As a freeper, I should know that. I read this and other sites every day. Why is it that I do not?

Everyday, I am bombarded with negative messages about Obama, and his administration. OK. I agree. Now what do WE do about it? Unless that question gets answered, I fear a Democrat POTUS again in 2012.

39 posted on 10/13/2010 9:06:42 AM PDT by Kenny Bunk (Revive The Poll Tax and Literacy Requirement for voter registration.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson