Posted on 09/18/2010 6:25:37 AM PDT by Kaslin
Back in July, the Washington Post’s Richard Cohen wrote:
What has come to be called the Obama Paradox is not a paradox at all. Voters lack faith inhim making the right economic decisions because, as far as they’re concerned, he hasn’t. He went for health-care reform, not jobs. He supported the public option, then he didn’t. He’s been cold to Israel’s Binyamin Netanyahu and then all over him like a cheap suit. Americans know Obama is smart. But we still don’t know him. Before Americans can give him credit for what he’s done, they have to know who he is. We’re waiting.
Having taken the Post’s advice and attempted to provide readers with an answer to that, Dinesh D’Souza and Forbes magazine find themselves in hot water, with the same President the Post relentlessly supported, despite, as Cohen wrote, knowing little about. As spotted by Big Journalism’s Frank Ross, Howard Kurtz of the Washington Post describes Robert Gibbs swinging into action to protect his boss from D’Souza’s hard-hitting article in the new edition of Forbes:
Dinesh D’Souza has drawn a torrent of criticism with a Forbes cover story that accuses President Obama of adopting “the cause of anti-colonialism” from his Kenyan father.
But while most detractors focus on the author–and Newt Gingrich, who embraced the critique–the White House is aiming its ammunition at the business magazine.
“It’s a stunning thing, to see a publication you would see in a dentist’s office, so lacking in truth and fact,” White House press secretary Robert Gibbs says in an interview. “I think it represents a new low.” [Did this new low occur unexpectedly...? -- Ed]
Gibbs is meeting with Thursday afternoon with Forbes’s Washington bureau chief, Brian Wingfield, to discuss his objections.
Nice magazine you’ve got there, Mr. Forbes. Be a shame if something were to happen to it…
As S.E. Cupp wrote a year ago:
President Obama has never looked less presidential than he does right now, unleashing his henchmen (and women) to snuff out Sean Hannity, Glenn Beck, the GOP, Rush Limbaugh, the Chamber of Commerce, Humana, and anyone else who hasn’t pledged allegiance. None of this legitimizes the president or his office…it just legitimizes his critics.
And now add Forbes to the ever-growing White House enemies list. Fortunately, so far, unlike WJLA-TV, which recently fired a reporter for refusing to toe the state-run line, Forbes is standing by their journalist. Kurtz writes:
The magazine would not make Editor in Chief Steve Forbes, who sought the Republican presidential nomination in 1996 and 2000, available for comment, or any other editor. The biweekly did issue a statement: “Dinesh D’Souza’s cover story was presented as an analysis of how the president thinks. No facts are in contention. Forbes stands by the story.”
I wonder if that last sentence resonates a little for Kurtz.
Remember the Official Narrative of Watergate, as millions watched in the film starring Robert Redford, Dustin Hoffman, and Jason Robards? Early in All the President’s Men, after watching White House press secretary Robert Ziegler trashing the Post’s coverage of the Nixon Administration, Robards, as then-Washington Post editor Ben Bradlee,emphatically responds that he stands by his reporters. Who then double-down and relentlessly pursue the Nixon Administration, thus restoring peace and harmony to the Beltway, the Upper West Side, and Beverly Hills. (Needless to say, reality was a bit more complex than that, but it makes for a great movie. I think Georges Sorel directed it, right?)
Presumably, Kurtz and the rest of the Washington Post staffers (well, those who weren’t on the JournoList) will sympathize if Forbes pursues a similar tack, having now been threatened in a similar fashion.
Also, don’t you love Gibbs saying, “It’s a stunning thing, to see a publication you would see in a dentist’s office, so lacking in truth and fact”?
Gibbs has a remarkably selective memory when it comes to presidential criticism, but I can think of a couple of publications often spotted in dentists’ offices that have run stories far worse than D’Souza’s in recent years, including one that until recent weeks, used to be owned by Kurtz’s employer.
Related: Should Home Depot’s founder fear a visit from an associate of President Vercotti? We can guarantee that not a single piece of plywood is done over, for 15 bob a week…
He has yet to convince me.
Not just you
PING !
Obama has never looked less presidential than he does right now.
But he sure looks like a student of Hellen Keller driving school.
You said it
The only magazines I see in my dentist’s office are architect magazines and Time and Newsweek.
Americans know Obama is smart.”
Correction, we’ve been told Obama is smart. The evidence so far flatly contradicts that assertion. Clinton, as much as I disliked him was smart. Obama clearly cannot think on his feet and they now protect him from any type of unscripted interaction. When allowed to freewheel he consistently steps in it and then mucks things up even worse when he attempts to clarify. Obama’s genius is as much a fiction as the other elements of his carefully created but unsubstantiated public personna.
Steve Forbes needs to hang tough here. They’re going to bluster but it’s apparent D’Souza’s article is factual. It’s just that the boy-emperor and his court don’t care much for this public disrobing.
If you were to ask those same people who make the assertion for examples, they would doubtlessly cite his attending Harvard as one. If you countered with the fact that Bush II graduated from both Harvard and Yale, they would deny that as evidence of Bush's smarts, but rather as evidence of Bush I's influence.
Apparently, if you're a lib democrat and you attend an ivy-league school, you're qualified to become a philosopher king. If you're a republican and you graduate from an ivy-league school, it's proof that those very same institutions are corrupt, money-grubbing diploma mills that will grant credentials to anyone with a pulse and money for tuition.
Americans know Obama is smart
**************************************
SMART AT WHAT???????
(and don’t tell me he knew how to run a campaign...he won because of ACORN)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.