Democrat's Unscrupulous plan to Demonize Republicans

Creating Orwellian Worldview ^ | 8/9/10 | Alaphiah

[Alaphiah123]

With all of this contrived talk about Tea Parties and Racism we get an actual look into the soul of Democrat depravity à la Democrat Super partisan Keith Olbermann and Uber-Democrat partisan Howard Dean as they discuss how Democrats plan to wage war against Republicans coming up until this November.

And what do we find? We find that calling the Tea Party Racists is nothing at all but a plot of Democrats to demonize Tea Parties. Since Democrats had such grand success in turning the entire world against George W. Bush, they think that employing the very same strategy will work against everyone that they perceive as an enemy or a threat, i.e. Tea Parties and Republicans.

Keith Olbermann: So, there are two goals here in the midterms that we’ve been able to identify so far on the part of the Democrats, which is, one, is to equate the Republicans to the Tea Party and to equate there Republicans to the previous Republicans who occupied the White House, which would be Bush.

Howard Dean: Right. Exactly (see 8:32min video)

[Howie66]

Would somebody please show me where the party of RATs have any scruples at all?

I know that there used to be a time that they did. It’s been quite some time ago, however.

[pnh102]

When was the last time the Democrats didn’t demonize Republicans?

[himno hero]

Yuppers, we have the plo in the White House. They fund them and use their strategies against the great Satan!

[kromike]

And it will work, too. Because the Steele-GOP is more interested in "always working with our friends across the aisle in a new era of bipartisanship & cooperation".

Gag.

[FrankR]

The most common mistake democrats make when launching their "demonizing" campaigns is, they don't realize they are just preaching to the choir.

For the most part, conservatives are of the "independent" sort - they neither base their lives or their decisions on "groups".

On the other hand, democrats think in "groupthink"...everything is about the collective and their groups are easily herded; all it takes is a few dollars tossed about here and there.

Libs want free dollars, conservatives want to be free to make dollars.

The left waited way too long to start "bushitizing" the TEA party movement...it's entrenched already; all of it's followers know instictly what it stands for and what it means - a definition lost on the left.

Most of us can listen to a candidate for five minutes and tell if s/he is a RINO or not...it's NOT that difficult. And, the individual is not easily swayed by glass beads and paper mache trinkets.

The left is stepping out to re-define the TEA party movement in their own image but we know that image way too well and it ain't going to work. You see, we have a long history of dealing with republicans who are not what they say, RINOs are everywhere and easy to spot.

So let the dems DEMonize away on the TPM...the only ones who will buy it will be the ones who already hate the TPM, like the obama progressives.

They did hit on Bush pretty hard, and maybe some of it was deserved, but I'll bet if obama ran against Bush right now, Bush would win.

[piytar]

And in other news, water is still wet, the sun will rise in the east tomorrow, and red is still a color...

[DManA]

Republicans should play rope-a-dope with the democrats. You don’t like Bush? Guess what? Either do we. He was a big government, big spending, disaster -— JUST LIKE YOU GUYS. So bring on the Bush bashing. You are just bashing yourselves.

[DManA]

As I am not a big government, big spending, big debt RINO, that is not true. And unless you are, I'm not bashing you so cool down.

You are just bashing yourselves.

[justsaynomore]

That reminds me of a bizarre discussion I had with a liberal the other day. She kept saying “But George Bush this and George Bush that...”

I just kept saying, “Yes, I agree”. It made her upset, and she kept raising her voice LOL.

I will concede that point to a liberal (even if I don’t agree with all of it) because then you turn around and point out the contradiction — if those things make you so upset about Bush why wouldn’t they make you upset about Obama?

[justsaynomore]

That reminds me of a bizarre discussion I had with a liberal the other day. She kept saying “But George Bush this and George Bush that...”

I just kept saying, “Yes, I agree”. It made her upset, and she kept raising her voice LOL.

I will concede that point to a liberal (even if I don’t agree with all of it) because then you turn around and point out the contradiction — if those things make you so upset about Bush why wouldn’t they make you upset about Obama?

[DManA]

Liberals are trying to claim that Bush’s laissez faire economics and deregulation caused our financial problems. They can’t be allowed to get away with that fantasy. And if pointing out that Bush was in fact ANTI free the market and INCREASED regulations is bashing then so be it.

Their basic premise in criticizing Bush is A HUGE LIE.

[DManA]

Looks like the post I was replying to was removed. I don’t know why. I didn’t think it was THAT bad.

[justsaynomore]

Yes, I realize all of that.

I have never been able to convince any liberal otherwise, though, so I focus instead on pointing out their hypocrisy.

[DManA]

What surprises and disappoints me is how many conservatives need to be convinced.

[lodi90]

“Their basic premise in criticizing Bush is A HUGE LIE.”

This is the dim gameplan for the election. LIE, LIE, LIE. Coordinated from Barry on down. What makes it effective is the journolist media and that Republicans rarely call them on it. Even when Reid directly called them “anti-American” they did nothing but roll over. Them’s fightin’ words and you never heard a peep in reply from Republicans.