Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Congress May Bring Back The Draft
The Partisan ^ | Nick

Posted on 08/01/2010 7:48:14 PM PDT by citizenredstater9271

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-145 next last
To: citizenredstater9271

Rangel brings this up about every 2 years.

and then he votes against it.


21 posted on 08/01/2010 8:03:07 PM PDT by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gthog61

It isn’t supposed to be a sensible law, just meant to create as much division among the American people as they can raise. Democrats are criminal scum. They manipulate to remain in power.


22 posted on 08/01/2010 8:03:16 PM PDT by MHGinTN (Dem voters, believing they cannot be deceived, it is impossible to convince them when deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: citizenredstater9271

http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h111-5741

H.R. 5741: Universal National Service Act

Sponsor: Rep. Charles Rangel [D-NY15] (no cosponsors)

Text on Thomas Register: http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c111:h5741:


23 posted on 08/01/2010 8:05:11 PM PDT by Texas Fossil (Government, even in its best state is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gertie

Congress lost me a long time ago.


24 posted on 08/01/2010 8:05:22 PM PDT by Ciexyz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Even the Democrats aren’t that stupid. If they do institute a draft, it’ll be for Mr. Obama’s Civilian National Security Force.


Yes, two years of additional socialist training and development of community organizing skills. Brown shirts will be supplied...or are they purple?


25 posted on 08/01/2010 8:06:25 PM PDT by excopconservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: citizenredstater9271
...two years of military or security service. ... they would have to choose noncombatant or civilian service, which will be defined by the President.

Civilian security service, as defined by the President. Gee, would they get to wear brown shirts and knee-high leather boots too? NFW hussein, NFW.

26 posted on 08/01/2010 8:06:56 PM PDT by ThunderSleeps (obama out now! I'll keep my money, my guns, and my freedom - you can keep the change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: citizenredstater9271

I support Obama 100%. It would obviously jack up his ratings in short course, this whole country is just anxious to be armed and looking for a battle.

I am 53 but if I get some of that Just for men hair color I can pass for 42.

I want to be a tanker.


27 posted on 08/01/2010 8:06:56 PM PDT by Eye of Unk ("In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act" G.Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: citizenredstater9271
111th CONGRESS

2d Session

H. R. 5741

To require all persons in the United States between the ages of 18 and 42 to perform national service, either as a member of the uniformed services or in civilian service in furtherance of the national defense and homeland security, to authorize the induction of persons in the uniformed services during wartime to meet end-strength requirements of the uniformed services, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

July 15, 2010

Mr. RANGEL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services


A BILL

To require all persons in the United States between the ages of 18 and 42 to perform national service, either as a member of the uniformed services or in civilian service in furtherance of the national defense and homeland security, to authorize the induction of persons in the uniformed services during wartime to meet end-strength requirements of the uniformed services, and for other purposes.

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE; TABLE OF CONTENTS.

TITLE I--NATIONAL SERVICE

TITLE II--AMENDMENTS TO MILITARY SELECTIVE SERVICE ACT

TITLE I--NATIONAL SERVICE

SEC. 101. DEFINITIONS.

SEC. 102. NATIONAL SERVICE OBLIGATION.

SEC. 103. INDUCTION TO PERFORM NATIONAL SERVICE.

SEC. 104. TWO-YEAR PERIOD OF NATIONAL SERVICE.

SEC. 105. IMPLEMENTATION BY THE PRESIDENT.

SEC. 106. EXAMINATION AND CLASSIFICATION OF PERSONS.

SEC. 107. DEFERMENTS AND POSTPONEMENTS.

SEC. 108. INDUCTION EXEMPTIONS.

SEC. 109. CONSCIENTIOUS OBJECTION.

SEC. 110. DISCHARGE FOLLOWING NATIONAL SERVICE.

TITLE II--AMENDMENTS TO MILITARY SELECTIVE SERVICE ACT

SEC. 201. REGISTRATION OF FEMALES.

SEC. 202. REGISTRATION AND INDUCTION AUTHORITY.


28 posted on 08/01/2010 8:07:42 PM PDT by Texas Fossil (Government, even in its best state is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: citizenredstater9271

Go for it, I threw out my draft card 47 years ago!


29 posted on 08/01/2010 8:09:30 PM PDT by dalereed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gertie

Rangle has no clue. While it serves some lofty libtard goal of conscripting the children of the wealthy and not so well off equally, he wants to eliminate the idea that conscripts do not perform as well as volunteers.


30 posted on 08/01/2010 8:10:38 PM PDT by Ouderkirk (Democrats...the party of Slavery, Segregation, Sodomy, and Sedition)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Niuhuru

Its great that conservatives and progressive hippie pinkos are getting united against the president.


31 posted on 08/01/2010 8:11:54 PM PDT by Munson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: citizenredstater9271

No they won’t. This election is going to kick their butts hard enough already. Rangle keeps introducing this bill to prove some point that nobody cares about, but it’ll never pass. Not unless they actually find a majority in Congress that want to retire.


32 posted on 08/01/2010 8:13:34 PM PDT by discostu (like a dog being shown a card trick)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: citizenredstater9271

Charlie the Crook has been trying to do this for years. I don’t see it going anywhere this time either. Especially when the boy already has a ton of ethics problems he is going to have to deal with.


33 posted on 08/01/2010 8:14:33 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (Ich bin ein illegal alien! - Barry Obama standing up with Central and South America against Arizona.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: citizenredstater9271

congress better bring back sanity.with reid claiming to have saved ford motors , jackson lee praising south vietnam and pelosi claiming 500 billion jobs would have been lost if not for the bail out...we got a big problem with BOZO’s in DC


34 posted on 08/01/2010 8:14:37 PM PDT by dalebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: citizenredstater9271
(3) The term `national service' means military service or service in a civilian capacity that, as determined by the President, promotes the national defense, including national or community service and service related to homeland security.

--

SEC. 105. IMPLEMENTATION BY THE PRESIDENT.

(a) In General- The President shall prescribe such regulations as are necessary to carry out this title.

35 posted on 08/01/2010 8:16:08 PM PDT by Texas Fossil (Government, even in its best state is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dalereed

It is supposed to be mandatory for ppl between 18-42. Gov. taking over your life. Welcome to socailism. Too bad the kid who posted this doesnt get that.


36 posted on 08/01/2010 8:17:09 PM PDT by citizenredstater9271
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Texas Fossil

More BHO fascism for you.


37 posted on 08/01/2010 8:18:25 PM PDT by citizenredstater9271
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: citizenredstater9271

This bill is not a request born out of need, or even want, on the side of the military. It’s born out of jealousy and malice so Rangel can force “the rich kids” into the military.


38 posted on 08/01/2010 8:18:36 PM PDT by Personal Responsibility (The problem isn't that 1% of muslims are terrorists. The problem is 99% of terrorists are muslim)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: citizenredstater9271

Commie blog or not, this wouldn’t surprise me one bit. Dear leader’s going to need his own goon squads soon if he keeps up his antics.


39 posted on 08/01/2010 8:19:25 PM PDT by RWB Patriot ("My ability is a value that must be purchased and I don't recognize anyone's need as a claim on me.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eye of Unk
I want to be a tanker.

Hell my previous 10 yrs with Uncle Sugar taught me that Supply Sergeant is the slot to get.
Recreation Facility Management is also a good one for those of us getting a bit 'long in the tooth'...;)

As always...RLTW!

40 posted on 08/01/2010 8:19:40 PM PDT by Tainan (Cogito, ergo conservatus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-145 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson