To: Palter
If Bush had been given that same power 90% of the people on this board would be all for it.
8 posted on
07/12/2010 8:21:29 AM PDT by
FightThePower!
(Fight the powers that be!)
To: FightThePower!
10 posted on
07/12/2010 8:28:27 AM PDT by
Durus
(The People have abdicated our duties and anxiously hopes for just two things, "Bread and Circuses")
To: FightThePower!
To: FightThePower!
You’ve been a member since 2000 and you still don’t comprhend the nature of Freepers? ... Pitiful.
15 posted on
07/12/2010 8:33:01 AM PDT by
MHGinTN
(Obots, believing they cannot be deceived, it is impossible to convince them when they are deceived.)
To: FightThePower!
i sure as hell wouldn’t have gone along with it.
0bama cuts off the internet and the revolution would be touched off.
19 posted on
07/12/2010 9:10:32 AM PDT by
Finatic
("you see kids were so much wiser after the wars")
To: FightThePower!
If Bush had been given that same power 90% of the people on this board would be all for it. Bullshit. Were 90% of FReepers on board for Bush "immigration reform"? For his rationale for signing McCain-Feingold? Hell no.
25 posted on
07/12/2010 11:08:47 AM PDT by
montag813
(http://www.facebook.com/StandwithArizona)
To: FightThePower!
I agree.
Another abuse of power was the 2007 John Warner Defense Act. If FReepers spoke out and condemed it, I don't recall. I was lurking back then. If they did, good for them. I'm sure there was alot of FReepers concerned by that power grab.
It gave the President control over the National Guard[Hello State's Power?] and allowed the use of Armed Force to be imployed over some very liberal reasons: 'incident' ??? etc.
27 posted on
07/12/2010 11:40:19 AM PDT by
Palter
(Kilroy was here.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson