A Shariah-Compliant Nominee?

Accuracy in Academia ^ | June 1, 2010 | Malcolm A. Kline

[bs9021]

A Shariah-Compliant Nominee?

Malcolm A. Kline, June 1, 2010

The academic tenure of Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan at Harvard Law gives us a glimpse into not only the predilection of such institutions for systems not compatible with the U. S. Constitution but also the likelihood that such legal systems will play an increasingly unwelcome role in America’s future. “It turns out that, at the very moment Ms. Kagan was pushing aggressively to remove military recruiters from the Harvard Law School campus during her tenure as its dean, she was very supportive of having what amounted to Saudi recruiters ensconced there for the purpose of enlisting some of the nation’s finest young lawyers to work for the industry known as Shariah-Compliant Finance (SCF),” Frank Gaffney of the Center for Security Policy notes on BigGovernment.com. “The first insight this record suggests is that Ms. Kagan’s true motivation in barring the armed forces was, indeed, an animus towards the military, rather than concern about its supposed mistreatment of homosexuals.”

“After all, the theo-political-military-legal code that authoritative Islam calls ‘Shariah’ and that is the law of the land in Saudi Arabia is infinitely more homophobic than the Pentagon’s efforts to enforce the U.S. statute that prohibits avowed gays and lesbians from serving in uniform. The former requires the murder of homosexuals; the latter simply kept them out of the ranks.”

Few have noticed that Kagan’s tenure at Harvard coincides with Saudi investment in same. “Thanks to millions of dollars gifted by an aggressive promoter of the so-called ‘civilizational jihad’ espoused by the Shariah-adherent Muslim Brotherhood, Prince Alwaleed bin Talal, and other Saudi sources, Harvard University is now a major beachhead of Shariah in America,” Gaffney argues....

[Uncle Miltie]

Islamophile Carpet Muncher Alert!

[AmericanInTokyo]

Any adherent to Shariah on the soil of our Great Republica will necessarily upon being administered the oath of office to a Federal Bench including the highest judicial post, be in violation of said oath speficially. They will not be taking the oath bearing true faith and allegience to the same, and they will not be taking it without an purpose of evasion or mental reservation.

This simply would not fly. An article to impeach or recall would be immediately in order.

[Fantasywriter]

This woman is looking worse and worse. If the Republicans roll over for her it will be simply unforgivable. She has no business anywhere near a judgeship of any kind, much less the Supreme Court.

Btw, does anyone know of a site or other resource that’s keeping track of all the Kagan issues, and has them organized in easy-to-access form? There are still people out there who think this woman exhibits even a vestige of ‘moderation.’ It would be helpful to have a single post or other one-stop resource to which to refer such individuals.