NATO Needs To Give Turkey The Boot!

Amerisrael ^

[Amerisrael]

Turkey's membership in NATO provides Islamists with veto power over any proposed action.

And with Turkey's closer ties to the Iranian Islamist regime, they for certain would block and proposed military action on the part of NATO to destroy or at least set back Iran's nuclear weapons program.

Before NATO can undertake any major action it must have 100% unanimous consent from all of it's members.

There are 28 member nations of NATO. Turkey was the only one to oppose the nomination of former Danish PM Anders Fogh Rassmussen for the job of Secretary General of NATO.

They were angered over Rassmussen's earlier defense of free-speech in regards to a cartoon of Mohammed published in a Danish newspaper. Islamists from around the world had urged Turkey to block the nomination.

Then Obama stepped in. The result was that Turkey was guaranteed that one of Rassmussen's deputys would be a Turk, Turkish commanders would be present at the NATO alliance command. In addition, Rassmussen bowed the knee and issued an apology for the cartoons.  

Just this past Monday a meeting was held in DC of the NATO Strategic Concept Experts Group charged with formulating a strategic mission for NATO over the next 10 years. 

Former Clinton Secretary of State Madeleine Albright heads up the group of "experts" tasked with advising for a new strategic concept for NATO.

[Certainly doesn't inspire confidence]

She was appointed by Anders Fogh Rassmussen last August '09 to "chair" the so-called group of "experts". Exactly how did that come about?

Don't believe Rassmussen thought it up himself. Someone must have "suggested" or strongly "advised" Rassmussen to appoint Albright.

In addition, two other "experts" in the group include advisors from the Albright Stonebridge Group: Fariba Yassaee and James O'brien.

The Albright Stonebridge Group is the result of a merger between Stonebridge International, co-founded by Sandy Berger,

[Migraine]

NATO Needs To Give Turkey The Boot!

Was wondering when I would finally see that statement. It is absolutely correct. Turkey's NATO status is nothing but a vestige of the cold war, when we needed them for a listening post on USSR's doorstep.

But now, I point out that EVERY large loss we have taken in Iraq and Afghan has been an inside job, where "trusted" muslim houseboys either gave out our position, movements, or just let perpetrators inside the perimeter.

Transfer that paradigm to a large-scale operator like Turkey, and we have a monumental loss of life waiting for us -- not if, but when.

Never EVER trust a muslim -- no way, no how.

[Mr. Mojo]

[Turkey] for certain would block an[y] proposed military action on the part of NATO to destroy or at least set back Iran's nuclear weapons program.

NATO would never go after Iran's nukes. ...Turkey or no Turkey. Especially with the Islamist-appeaser-in-chief in the WH.

It'll be Israel or no one.

[Gay State Conservative]

Many things I've read in the last couple of years strongly suggests that Turkey's going 9th Century on us.We'd be wise to kick them out of NATO now and the EU should drop them from their pending membership list.The Religion of Pieces,just like syphilis,is something that just spreads and spreads.

[zeke37]

Turkey has already done major exercises with Syria, and Russia, and signaled an interest in the Shanghai Cooperation Organization. Turkey will eventually join this alliance, whether we push them away or not.

[Steve Van Doorn]

Should of booted them when they didn't allow our troops through their country in to northern Iraq.

now even a blind man can see the obvious

[eleni121]

With the assistance of the embarrassing government in DC the Turk parastate is in its ascendancy-—albeit short lived.

The fact remains that the US - that is us - continues to support this muslim genocidal paratste with billions and billions...along with that other terror state - the Saudi one.

We are witnessing the formation of a Secular Islamic alliance that will destroy us. Literally. Unless...