Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: butterdezillion
I wasn’t aware of that either. Can the people who knew the president was ineligible and refused to enforce the Constitution be tried for treason?

No. The definition of treason is in Article III of the Constitution.

56 posted on 03/25/2010 9:23:23 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]


To: Non-Sequitur

Wouldn’t it be “giving aid and comfort” to the enemy of the United States if somebody (such as, for instance, Nancy Pelosi) perjured herself by swearing that a usurper was eligible? Or anybody who KNEW that a foreign takeover of the White House was happening and still voted to certify the election results?

We honestly don’t even know if Obama is a United States citizen. (And I don’t say that lightly at all; see http://butterdezillion.wordpress.com/2010/01/11/red-flags-in-hawaii-2/ to see some of my research on this subject.) If a non-US citizen tried to take over the White House, that person would be an enemy of the United States - right? If Hugo Chavez, for instance, tried to become president he would be recognized as an enemy of the US, wouldn’t he?

What would be considered “giving comfort and aid” to such a person? Would suppressing investigations of him? I realize that somebody giving comfort and aid out of ignorance that the person was an enemy of the US is different, but I’m talking about people who either knew or would have known if they had done a reasonable level of diligence.


59 posted on 03/25/2010 9:35:21 AM PDT by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson