Posted on 03/11/2010 10:03:45 AM PST by Kfobbs
According to a report released Monday by the Archives of Internal Medicine, there is a growing epidemic across developed nations like the United States. The study recommends that one possible sure fire method for slowing the escalation of obesity in America would be to add a “surcharge” ie.added taxes or fees.
Ann Arbor, America are you ready to may more in order to eat less? Mitchell H. Katz, MD; Rajiv Bhatia, MD, MPH, author of the study is betting that Americans might be willing to “put their money where their mouth is.”
Oh really. Perhaps the notion of paying more in order to consume less sugar-sweetened beverage “to discourage their use and/or to fund interventions that promote alternative beverages,” may prove ideal in...
(Excerpt) Read more at examiner.com ...
what about diet drinks?
I recall that they threw GHW Bush out for breaking a “no new taxes” promise...
Has taxing the hell out of cigarettes caused everyone to stop smoking?
Clearly, that ship sailed awhile ago, but it might be nice to bring it back. I'm tired of the social engineering.
The purpose of the tax is increased revenue. Obesity is the excuse.
Lightened pocket book...
Lightened body...
Where’s the corelation ???
That’s discrimination! Now only rich people can be fat. I want a tax credit for soda and french fries!
“My body, my choice.”
Isn’t that what freaked-out liberals chant?
Actually it has. Around 20% of the adult population now are smokers as opposed to around 75% in the 50s and 60s. I’d say it also has to do with the ever growing demonization of smokers. When fat begins to be demonized like smoking is, then people will be screaming, “Tax the hell out of fattening foods”.
It seems the real obesity problem is the government growing fatter by the day at the taxpayer’s expense.
Actually, yes it has but that is NOT what they really want. They just want to tax. The more that quit is the less in tax revenue.
Taxes have had an impact but I’d suggest the largest impact is the social stigma of smoking now and the knowledge about its health impact.
Everyone knows the money will just go into the general fund, so Dems can fund ACORN and the like.
“My body, my choice.”Isn’t that what freaked-out liberals chant?
And this very conservative person also says that - I will eat what I want to eat when I want to eat it and the rest of the world can take a flying leap!
Medical professionals may talk like this, but I think once the goverment gets involved, it’s all just a way to collect more revenue and try to control people’s lives. Tobacco taxes have been justified to discourage smoking and to promote a non-smoking lifestyle. I’ve noticed, though, the the last couple of times the tobacco tax went up here, they didn’t even talk about that any more. It was simply because the state needed more money and they targeted a group that no one is going to cry much about.
For all their lecturing about a healthy lifestyle, and their willingness to use government coersion to make it happen, I’m not really sure all health care professionals are on board for this, as far as their own lives are concerned. My father-in-law spent considerable time in the hospital a while back, so we were there a lot. The hospital had a “canteen,” a huge vending area in which almost all of the selections amounted to junk food. Nearly all of the nurses were on the rotund side. They even had soda machines — soda, not water, not juice — in each ward of the hospital. You didn’t even have to go downstairs to get that Coke.
Exactly!
How about fewer politicians to cut tax gains?
No, obviously. And that’s what they’re counting on; that people will continue paying taxes, increase after increase. Addiction is their friend.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.