Man, if true these guys need to lawyer up and file suit ASAP.
Its the only way we will ever get to the bottom of this, get the right law suit before the courts and then the press will have no choice but to cover it or end up looking like a bunch of hacks as they did during the ARCON Scandal.
So did the people in Hawaii break any specific law? If they did is there a court anywhere that will hear the case or a prosecutor that would bring charges?
I doubt it.
I wonder if they pay the trolls to work on Saturday, or are they considered government employees.
Where there’s smoke, indicates at least a smoldering fire inside the walls somewhere.
So the firemen have to keep hacking holes in the inside walls, until the source of that smoke is either extinguished or exposed to the open.
This is not the first time that obfuscation, dissimulation and misdirection have been used to shift attention away from uncomfortable facts. The steps being taken are eerily similar to the efforts to resist the investigations and revelations made by Senator Joe McCarthy some sixty years ago.
The conspiracy reaches some very high places. That makes what is going on no less of a conspiracy.
Unbelievable.
They should sue immediately.
What do you imagine they were promised or treatened with to elicit such conduct?
“The incriminating evidence was found in an inadvertent disclosure of emails between Ms. Janice S. Okubo...and Kenneth David, Supervisor of the Vital Statistics Office.”
How could confidential info like this be “found” ? I am THRILLED that it was, but seems unlikely for State officials
to release (inadvertently or not) ANY private communications ?
John Charleton suggests sending ALL complaints regarding misconduct (OIP and DoH) to “Ombundsman” is that an official in HI ?
obumpa
bump
ping
Globalists . . . are a law unto themselves.
serfs and slaves don’t count.
Translation:
All pigs are equal (under the law)... However, SOME pigs are MORE equal(under the law)than other pigs.
STE=Q
Check out this nonsense:
Obama’s citizenship shouldn’t be an issue
I am writing this letter in response to a recent published letter wherein the writer expressed his opinion regarding some of the positions taken by the President. The writer’s last sentence contained the phrase, “acting as if he were legitimate.”
Article II Section 1 Clause 5 of the Constitution states that the President must: be a natural born citizen of the United States; be at least 35 years old; have been a permanent resident in the United States for at least 14 years.
It is a fact that Hawaii is part of the United States of America. Evidence has been provided to confirm Barack Obama was born on Aug. 4, 1961 at Kap’olani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital in Honolulu. He had been a resident of Chicago, Illinois for at least 14 years.
It is a fact that a majority of American voted for Barack Obama to become the 44th President of the United States. There was no issue of Florida chads, nor was there a Supreme Court ruling as was the case in the last presidential election.
Is the writer referring to the rumor that was being circulated that Obama was not born in Hawaii? If so, is the writer not familiar with the media feeding frenzy that we have recently witnessed regarding the infidelity of John Edwards and Tiger Woods? I am certain that the President’s background was thoroughly vetted by the media and virtually every detail of his life and that of his family has been scrutinized.
Americans are guaranteed the right of freedom of speech as evidenced by the many letters that are published in your newspaper. Senator Patrick Moynihan once stated that, “everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts.”
What facts can the writer provide to substantiate his statement that President Obama is not legitimate?
ELOISE BRYANT TINLEY
Plainfield