Skip to comments.
Palin vs. Romney: It's the Statism, Stupid
Texas for Sarah Palin ^
| Monday, February 22, 2010 at 11:05 AM CST
| Josh Painter
Posted on 02/22/2010 9:22:25 AM PST by Josh Painter
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
To: Josh Painter
2
posted on
02/22/2010 9:25:32 AM PST
by
svcw
(If you are going to quote the Bible know what you are quoting.)
To: Josh Painter
I want a Todd Palin vs. Mitt Romney arm-wrestling match. Like the Stallone movie, “Over The Top.”
3
posted on
02/22/2010 9:27:33 AM PST
by
Mengerian
To: Mengerian
It's possible Sarah wouldn't need Todd.........
:-)
4
posted on
02/22/2010 9:29:33 AM PST
by
Lakeshark
(Thank a member of the US armed forces for their sacrifice)
To: Josh Painter
If the choice boils down to a Rockefeller Republican like Romney or a more traditionalist-conservative like Palin, I'll take the latter.
Romney's liberal past and unprincipled nature hangs around his neck like an albatross. There is no upside to a Willard candidacy in 2012.
5
posted on
02/22/2010 9:37:05 AM PST
by
Reagan Man
("In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem.")
To: Lakeshark
True. Sarah would dominate Romney in arm-wrestling, or anything else for that matter.
(Although the ever-seedy Mitt Romney might actually like that in some strange, kinky way.)
6
posted on
02/22/2010 9:37:24 AM PST
by
Mengerian
To: Josh Painter
Romney can say anything he likes , this is one Republican who refuses to vote for him.
7
posted on
02/22/2010 9:39:03 AM PST
by
Venturer
To: Josh Painter
Susan Page highlighted the contrasts between Romney, the choice of the Republican establishment, and Sarah Palin, favored by conservatives and anti-Washington activists such as those found in the Tea Party movement:Didn't Romney get 3x more votes than Palin at CPAC, a conservative gathering? Not only did the CPAC people pick two losers (Ron Paul and Romney), but Palin was an afterthought. I know some people love Palin, but her lack of support is eliminating her frontrunner chances.
8
posted on
02/22/2010 9:41:43 AM PST
by
999replies
(Thune/Rubio 2012)
To: Josh Painter
Since Sarah wasn't going to win the CPAC straw vote (RINO junior elitists and Paulists are not her constituency), I am glad Ron Paul won rather than Mittens. While we may not always agree with Paul, at least he stands for something other than himself.
Mitt Romney is a RINO’s ultimate wet dream.
9
posted on
02/22/2010 9:42:50 AM PST
by
bwc2221
To: 999replies
I question how conservative CPAC is any more.
10
posted on
02/22/2010 9:44:00 AM PST
by
bwc2221
To: Venturer
even if it’s between he and Obama?
To: Josh Painter
Romney deserves the loyalty he gave Gov. Palin -- NONE.
12
posted on
02/22/2010 9:46:38 AM PST
by
Diogenesis
("Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God." --Thomas Jefferson)
To: 999replies
Nice try, but 75% of CPAC attendees didn’t even bother to vote in the straw poll, perhaps because of the Ronulan kids who showed up just to dominate the poll for their guy.
The straw poll is not scientific; the public opinion polls conducted by Rasmussen, etc. are. Mitt’s narrow lead in the Gallup poll was less than the survey’s margin of error, which means it was a statistical tie between Palin and Romney.
CPAC becomes more establishment Republican every year, despite the barnburner speeches by Rubio and Glenn Beck.
- JP
13
posted on
02/22/2010 9:58:50 AM PST
by
Josh Painter
("We cannot spare this woman. She fights" - David Karki, regarding Sarah Palin)
To: Venturer
"Romney can say anything he likes , this is one Republican who refuses to vote for him."I'm another who won't vote for him, regardless of what he says.
"Economy, Security and family" are not much better than "hope change and unity", until you come up with some specific plans to get out of the way and/or help each.
14
posted on
02/22/2010 10:21:04 AM PST
by
DannyTN
To: Josh Painter
Nice try, but..I wasn't trying anything. My point was if she cannot garner a substantial amount of support at CPAC, then she might not be the dynamic candidate that some people are making her out to be. Since it wasn't scientific, then perhaps she should have gotten even more votes. I question how 'conservative' CPAC is too. What a strange poll result
15
posted on
02/22/2010 10:26:06 AM PST
by
999replies
(Thune/Rubio 2012)
To: bwc2221
I question how conservative CPAC is any more.You might have something there. I think I heard that if you paid for a sponsorship, you also got podium time. That is wrong.
16
posted on
02/22/2010 10:33:55 AM PST
by
999replies
(Thune/Rubio 2012)
To: 999replies
Obama will not run, and Romney won’t either.
17
posted on
02/22/2010 10:42:35 AM PST
by
stephenjohnbanker
(Support our troops, and vote out the RINOS)
To: FutureRocketMan
Given a choice between a gun grabber and a gun grabber, I’ll write in someone else.
18
posted on
02/22/2010 10:50:30 AM PST
by
Dead Corpse
(III, Oathkeeper)
To: stephenjohnbanker
Depends on who is chasing them.
19
posted on
02/22/2010 10:51:28 AM PST
by
Dead Corpse
(III, Oathkeeper)
To: Dead Corpse
RUH ROH...................
20
posted on
02/22/2010 10:56:17 AM PST
by
stephenjohnbanker
(Support our troops, and vote out the RINOS)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson