Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Welfare WAR is on FRONT IS OREGON

Posted on 01/28/2010 9:45:45 AM PST by New Hope Conservitive

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-100 next last
To: DCBryan1
We are going to use our army of Rednecks that cling to their bibles and gunz...

I GOT MINE!

61 posted on 01/28/2010 11:48:08 AM PST by Clinging Bitterly (We need to limit political office holders to two terms. One in office, and one in prison.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: New Hope Conservitive
That you, Olby?

troll spray Pictures, Images and Photos

62 posted on 01/28/2010 12:00:07 PM PST by Clinging Bitterly (We need to limit political office holders to two terms. One in office, and one in prison.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: indyhome11

I know they did. I live here.

And I am interested in seeing how many of those votes were fraudulent.


63 posted on 01/28/2010 12:04:13 PM PST by Danae (Don't think the Constitution matters? Try living in a country without one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: New Hope Conservitive

64 posted on 01/28/2010 12:11:22 PM PST by mojitojoe (“Medicine is the keystone of the arch of socialism.” - Vladimir Lenin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Danae
One thing that broke from recent history in this election was the near instant release of the Multnomah County Results, which brought the calling by the Portland Dead Fishwrapper. I don't know what that means - but in earlier times it was always the small rural counties that were last to report their results and Tuesday seemed much a throwback to those days. Perhaps it is more indicative of fraud in other races where the margins were tighter, and the urban counties reported after inserting the required number of votes to win.

I don't know if it would ever be possible to determine a precise number of fraudulent votes but I dare say 90,000 in Oregon seems impossible unless they have perfected some unknown technique.

All quite possible in this vote by mail state, where there are weeks instead of hours to cook the results. That's one reason I usually turn in my ballot on election day and not before.

65 posted on 01/28/2010 12:26:24 PM PST by Clinging Bitterly (We need to limit political office holders to two terms. One in office, and one in prison.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Danae
Oh I forgot to add - I really want to see investigation and zero tolerance prosecution of the illegal campaign activities that were discussed on the 85 board.

What do you suppose the chances are of that happening?

66 posted on 01/28/2010 12:30:15 PM PST by Clinging Bitterly (We need to limit political office holders to two terms. One in office, and one in prison.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Clinging Bitterly

You have a darned good point. I think there is a number people can cal land check and see if their vote was received. Hum. I wonder what would happen if 100000 thousand people who voted no called in only to find their votes had been changed?

I am gonna look for that number.


67 posted on 01/28/2010 12:41:31 PM PST by Danae (Don't think the Constitution matters? Try living in a country without one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Clinging Bitterly

I called Yamhill county - where I live, and was told you can call your county’s clerk’s office and they can tell you if your ballot was received, accepted, and therefore counted. There is No tabulation recording for HOW you voted. They separate the outside secrecy envelope from the inside ballot. I hope this helps some.

I know my ballot was received and counted.


68 posted on 01/28/2010 12:47:10 PM PST by Danae (Don't think the Constitution matters? Try living in a country without one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: New Hope Conservitive

Results of my Google search for “Conservitive”:

Urban Dictionary: conservitive
conservitive - 4 definitions - A conservative who can’t spell.
www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=conservitive

LOL!


69 posted on 01/28/2010 1:15:19 PM PST by Auntie Mame (Fear not tomorrow. God is already there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: New Hope Conservitive

I think it's a Zot stain!

70 posted on 01/28/2010 1:16:10 PM PST by MarineBrat (Better dead than red!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: New Hope Conservitive; derllak; Lakeshark; null and void; Borax Queen; Darlin'; catpuppy

Dearest derrly, this is why Sharky tells yu to be very careful out there in Oregonistan.
People like this mind numbed poster run the show in your state.


71 posted on 01/28/2010 1:36:22 PM PST by Darksheare (Tar is cheap, and feathers are plentiful.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 50mm

Ah, well. I got here too late for the ZOT. Next time...next time...


72 posted on 01/28/2010 2:03:04 PM PST by bcsco (Obama is the navel of his own universe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: New Hope Conservitive

A little too much ‘hash’ in your ‘ish’ there buddy? Bet your folks drove Ramblers when you were a kid. You still kind of ramble on, don’t ya.

But then I’m writing to the dead myself. After all, you’re gone back to your land of prepubescence where all life is a question; especially when it comes to writing ability.


73 posted on 01/28/2010 2:07:36 PM PST by bcsco (Obama is the navel of his own universe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Darksheare

Geez...even the title didn’t make sense, much less the rest of the article. You mind translating that for me? :P


74 posted on 01/28/2010 2:12:40 PM PST by derllak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: New Hope Conservitive

IATZ! Oh well, at least I can enjoy the after-zot party.


75 posted on 01/28/2010 2:13:31 PM PST by rdl6989 (January 20, 2013 The end of an error.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: derllak

I dunno, I don’t speak numblish.
But that’s what is running your state, so do be careful.


76 posted on 01/28/2010 2:14:07 PM PST by Darksheare (Tar is cheap, and feathers are plentiful.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Darksheare

Do garlic and crucifixes work on Democrats?


77 posted on 01/28/2010 2:43:17 PM PST by derllak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: derllak
Do garlic and crucifixes work on Democrats?

Depends on how hard you throw them.

78 posted on 01/28/2010 2:44:39 PM PST by paulycy (Demand Constitutionality.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: derllak

Not really.
Stake through the heart, but that works on everybody.


79 posted on 01/28/2010 3:08:51 PM PST by Darksheare (Tar is cheap, and feathers are plentiful.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: New Hope Conservitive; sionnsar; Tax-chick; Monkey Face; Dead Corpse; BJClinton
:Pssst!:

Over here.

It's got stupidity, incoherence, misspelling AND poor grammar.

It's perfect!

80 posted on 01/28/2010 3:15:52 PM PST by Harmless Teddy Bear (I miss the competent fiscal policy and flag waving patriotism of the Carter Administration)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-100 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson