Beginning To Correct The Obama Mistake

TalkingSides.com ^ | 01/19/10 | CaroleL

[CaroleL]

The recent Washington Post headline says it all "Poll shows growing disappointment, polarization over Obama's performance". Exactly one year after he took office, the majority of the American people say President Obama is not delivering on his major campaign promises and over a third say he is falling short of their expectations. This is not a sign of a fickle electorate. This is what happens when millions of people are conned by someone who has no idea how to do the job he has sworn to do. In response to the disappointment and disillusionment from former Obama supporters comes phrases like

[HapaxLegamenon]

I am hoping that the second Cater in my lifetime will be followed by the second Reagan.

[davisfh]

I’m less concerned about his not delivering on campaign promises and much, much more concerned that he is in the process of destroying the nation.

[lmarie373]

This is what happens when millions of people are conned by someone who has no idea how to do the job he has sworn to do.

this is the same reason I did not vote for him, to be honest like most voters I did not know about his shady past. I was pressured by my family to vote for him but at the last minute I changed my mind (McLame is no better but...)

I hope people wake up before its too late and kick his rearend out of the presidency.

[ExTexasRedhead]

Let’s not forget the traitors in the US Congress who are equally as guilty as Zero. We The People mean to correct at least 500 mistakes.

[Blind Eye Jones]

Very good article — concise and to the point. I saved it, you should be proud.

[Tucker39]

As an auctioneer, I have seen a number of cases of “buyer’s remorse” through the years. I think what we see setting in all over the country is a case of buyer’s remorse; BIGTIME!!!

We will be have the opportunity to put some salve on it in the elections this fall. But may it only grow and fester all the more, until in November 2012 we get to lance the boil and clean up the mess once and for all!!

[SuziQ]

Bump for later reading

[Oceander]

Fair enough, although I would tend to put more emphasis on the Fall elections this year, and a lot less on 2012. Winning 2012 would be nice, but it's icing on the cake compared to the necessity of breaking the Democrats' death-hold on Congress now, this year.

If we win 2012 but fail to break their hold this Fall, then whomever sits in the Whitehouse in 2012 will essentially be presiding over this country's funeral. On the other hand, if we break their hold this fall, but lose in 2012, then we will still get to enjoy the spectacle of a politically gelded Obama shrieking in impotent rage, with little flecks of spittle dotting his cheeks, and his veins popping out on his temples, as we shut down any more attempts to force the country leftward against its own wishes and best interests.

Considering the current crop of contenders, I for one would be inclined to vote for a second term for Zero-bama if, and I stress if, we can break the Democrats' hold on Congress with enough of a margin that we can reliably stop anymore leftward nonsense.

[SupplySider]

I am hoping that the second Cater in my lifetime will be followed by the second Reagan.

Amen.

A pro-growth, pro-American candidate with a sunny disposition could win over independents and many Democrats, as the great Gipper proved.

[jwparkerjr]

re: A pro-growth, pro-American candidate with a sunny disposition

Two words: Sarah Palin!