Posted on 11/10/2009 6:35:58 AM PST by mkboyce
“U.S. intelligence agencies were aware months ago that Army Major Nidal Hasan was attempting to make contact with people associated with al Qaeda, two American officials briefed on classified material in the case told ABC News.” http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/fort-hood-shooter-contact-al-qaeda-terrorists-officials/story?id=9030873
“Months ago”!!!
Yet Hasan was allowed to remain in the Army and, for all we know, was not placed under heavy surveillance!? WHY!?
Just like when it comes to light that a school district or a church kept a known child-molester on staff and covered it up by shuffling him or her around, the powers that be in our military, political and intelligence structure have blood on their hands for what happened at Fort Hood last week (Yes, Barry, I just jumped to a conclusion). From Hasan’s fellow officers and commanders, who knew about his crazed, Islamopathic diatribes. To sinister political forces afoot that make it untenable for anyone -- particularly if you’re white -- to criticize racial, ethnic or religious minorities, even when they’re doing something so clearly wrong. To intelligence officials at the CIA, who may or may not have informed the Army of Hasan’s attempts to contact -- not his friends, not his granny-down-the-block -- but our enemies, Al-Qaeda!
If this were WWII and some Fascist scumbag tried to contact Nazi agents and was caught, how long do you think a military court would have taken to throw the switch on Ol’ Sparky? Why is it any different when a radicalized Muslim does the same thing? To wit, what happened to our society on the way to the 21st Century?
Also, why pray-tell is it so difficult for President Obama to call a cowardly act of violence, committed in the name of Islam, for the terrorism that it was? (Hasan jumped on a table in the middle of a crowded room and shouted “Allahu Akbar” before mowing down his unarmed victims in a hail of gunfire.)
The families of the victims should not only sue the Army for their seemingly willful negligence, but complain loudly on Capitol Hill that our government utterly failed to protect their loved ones for fear of upsetting the gods of political correctness, i.e. don’t offend the trouble-maker Muslim, for he might get upset. Let’s just shuffle him from Walter Reed Army Medical Center in Washington D.C. to the hinterlands of Fort Hood in Texas.
Do remember that, despite Obama’s obfuscations, we are still at war with radical Islam ("British spies help prevent al-Qaeda inspired attack on New York subway") and no amount of cowardly appeasement, flowery, Orwellian language (terrorism = “man-caused disasters” in the Obama Administration) or kid-glove treatment of bitter, Islamicized, Army Majors will change that.
Curiously however, instead of being concerned with, I don’t know, another Muslim lunatic in the midst of our military, it seems that our Secretary of Homeland Security and the inventor of the “man-caused disaster” idiocy, Janet Napolitano, is more concerned with the phony scourge of an anti-Muslim backlash.
"Janet Napolitano says her agency is working with groups across the United States to try to deflect any backlash against American Muslims following Thursday's rampage by Army Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan, a Muslim who reportedly expressed growing dismay over the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan." http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5j8GOiUlCCnhCsRp1Xvs94KDJh8owD9BR9GPG0
Instead of being worried about a theoretical backlash, should not Napolitano be more concerned with the clear and present danger that radical Islam still presents to our populace, both civilian and military? Or is being bat-shit crazy the new black?
Regardless, this is what happens when weak, overtly political animals, who not only vote “present” when the going gets tough, but will not -- indeed cannot -- call a spade a spade, are charged with making important, consequential decisions. Innocent people pay with their lives.
- Marco
Contrast that with Barry's condemnation of the Cambridge police officer before "all the facts were in".
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2382194/posts?page=9#9
To: BIGLOOK; Grampa Dave; LucyT; Candor7; jazusamo; Jeff Head; Beckwith
Greta on Fox News just interviewed a fellow officer of this perp who took several courses together.
He noted that Hassan repeated said in various Army classes that Islamic law was supreme over the US Constitutiion.
Several officers complained to the Army professors of their different classes.
Noting negative apparently happened as Hassan then was promoted to Major.
and more
9 posted on Monday, November 09, 2009 8:08:57 PM by george76 (Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
have there been any violent threats against Muslims made? Is there any history of violence against Muslims in this nation that should Janet should make such recommendations?
Don't jump to any conclusions, don't get all wee-weed up or act stupidly. Maybe we can all meet at the White Crib for a brewski. And whatever you do, don't call Hasan a 'jackass'. Remember, 'diversity' in the military now includes the kid-gloves handling of embedded jihadists.
We no longer live in America.
This is really getting ugly.
“This is really getting ugly.”
Actually, this has been ugly for years, and his bosses at Walter Reed ignored his behavior.
Apparently the CIA, FBI and other investigative organizations buried the info on this walk IED Jihadist.
“This is really getting ugly.”
Actually, this has been ugly for years, and his bosses at Walter Reed ignored his behavior.
Apparently the CIA, FBI and other investigative organizations buried the info on this walk IED Jihadist.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.