URGENT! Sign the Petition to the FDA to Defeat Mandatory Swine Flu Vaccinations !!!

To: Dockets Management Branch } PETITION Food and Drug Administration Room 1061 } With Request for Emergency Relief: 5630 Fishers Lane HFA-305 Temporary Stay of all Pending Rockville, MD 20852 } “Swine Flu” Vaccine Approvals

Pursuant to the Constitution of the United States of America, First Amendment, Right to Petition for Redress of Grievances the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), 21 U.S.C. §§ 321 et seq., and the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), 5 U.S.C. § 553(e), to amend the FDA's rules respecting the safety, effectiveness and availability of vaccines said to be useful for swine flu (A-H1N1-09), the undersigned Petitioners PETITION the Unites States, to wit:

1. This Petition is brought before the Executive Authority of the United States of America, mindful of the President’s call for transparency in government and science-based decision-making.

2. Petitioners are several nongovernmental organizations involved in health care civil rights and several individuals who are adversely impacted by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and/or the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) actions referred to in this Petition, and all persons who join in this Petition hereafter.

3. This Petition is submitted to request specific action by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and/or the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) (the Federal Agencies) within the scope of the mandated duties thereof, in order to exhaust administrative remedies.

4. The primary purpose of the Petition is to seek emergency actions with regard to the immanent Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and/or the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) granting of various drug-interest commercial applications or approval and widespread use of various so-called “H1N1” “A-H1N1-09” or “Swine Flu” vaccines (herein, the Vaccines).

5. The Vaccine Approvals are being treated as emergency drug approvals, but are being sought without even minimal science-based safety testing or testing for clinical efficacy in preventing disease, and with the inclusion of dangerous adjuvants, including Mercury, and squalene, which has never been heretofore approved as a vaccine adjuvant. Legal immunity has been granted a priori to the manufactures, the Federal Government and its agents in the event of harm or death from these vaccines.

6. a. As one example, within the past two weeks, the British Neurological Surveillance Unit (BNSU) warned of “the Government’s concern about releasing a vaccine of unknown safety.” and has alerted its members to be on the alert for an up to 8-fold increase in Guillain-Barre Syndrome (GBS) due to the Vaccines that are the subject of this Petition.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1206807/ Swine-flu-jab-link-killer-nerve-disease-Leaked-letter-reveals-concern-neurologists-25-deaths-America.html#ixzz0OJSgKn4b

b. The United States government has paid nearly two billion dollars to the families of individuals who have been killed or maimed by vaccines as part the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program. A massive increase in the use of vaccines such as the swine flu vaccine that is the subject of this petition will be likely to significantly increase the number of individuals harmed by vaccines.

7. (a) The first action sought is an emergency Temporary Stay of the pending Vaccine approval applications. The applications should be denied. Petitioners request a Public Hearing. Petitioners are in immanent peril of irreparable harm if the Temporary Stay is not granted immediately.

(b) Additionally, the Petitioners petition the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and/or the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) to open and accept public comments and include, as part of any approval of the Vaccines, requiring strong warnings to the public, as mandated by the United States Supreme Court in another context, Thompson v. Western States Medical Center - 535 U.S. 357, 2002:

"If the First Amendment means anything, it means that regulating speech must be a last - not first - resort. ... We have previously rejected the notion that the Government has an interest in preventing the dissemination of truthful commercial information in order to prevent members of the public from making bad decisions with the information."

"Even if the Government did argue that it had an interest in preventing misleading advertisements, this interest could be satisfied by the far less restrictive alternative of requiring each compounded drug to be labeled with a warning that the drug had not undergone FDA testing and that its risks were unknown."

The warning should therefore read: “This Vaccine has not undergone FDA safety or efficacy testing and its risks are unknown in all age groups. This Vaccine contains ingredients previously rejected for use in the United State and/or never evaluated by the FDA which have been shown in animal studies to cause significant adverse biological response when injected.”

(c) The Petitioners petition the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and/or the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) to engage in a vigorous public information campaign, interleaved with their promotion of the Vaccines, and given equal prominence in type face, media announcements, web presence and other methods of public information used to promote the Vaccines, stating that the Vaccines contain ingredients previously rejected for use in the United State and/or never evaluated by the FDA which have been shown in animal studies to cause significant adverse biological response when injected.

(d) The Petitioners petition the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and/or the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) to recommend to all implementing agencies, such as State Departments of Health, that these un-insurable, unproven and untested Vaccines not be subject to any legal mandate, whether direct or indirect, perceived or actual, requiring their use by any class of persons in order for such persons to receive government services, such as schooling, or to work in particular employments, such as first responders or health care workers, or to travel or to attend any public places or for any other purpose.

(e) The Petitioners petition the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and/or the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) to recommend voluntary Self-Shielding at home in preference to vaccination or removal to FEMA or other relocation facilities in the event of a Declared Pandemic Emergency.

Hmmmm. The text does not match the title. I guess I was unable to find anything in the body of the text that addressed mandatory H1n1 vaccinations. Did you post the wrong text perhaps?

In any event, the title would never happen.

Editorial license perhaps?

I am not certain that this is mandatory now. The nurses that come in here are just having to sign waivers, and I believe the religious exemption is still in place for the schools.

This petition didn’t smell right for someone who is alledgedly well educated (especially in the sciences). I did a bit of checking, including Quackwatch.com. Apparently, Dr. Null has a bit of academic “baggage” that follows him.

See for yourself at,

http://www.quackwatch.org/04ConsumerEducation/null.html

Understand there are a boatload of charlatans in the health industry. That’s why Quackwatch is a useful site. Just ‘cause someone sticks Dr. in front of their name, doesn’t mean they know squat, or that they've jumped through the same academic hoops that other PhD’s have. From what I see, I wouldn’t give his stuff much credibility, but read the article and see what you think.

Just thought you might find it interesting, as you seem to be carrying his water.

In fla. schools if made mandatory you can’t claim religious
exemption, and our wonderful governor says we will all take
the shot if mandatory or go to jail.

Petition, petition, petition, does anyone think these idiots read anything or give a crap? We are not dealing with true Americans we are dealing with maniacs hell bent on destroying everything and rebuilding

I haven’t heard of any plans to institute a mandatory vaccination. If anyone tries to force a vaccination on me I will treat it the same way I would a forceful home invasion.

So far we haven’t had a push here in NC. My last is in a private Christian school so that it is unlikely to cave. At some point we have to stand up and say no. Individually or en masse, but someone has to stand up first. Maybe your neighbor will.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.