Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

REVEALED-Obama's Czar System Caused the Van Jones Vetting System
Fox News / The Lid ^ | 9/7/09 | The Lid

Posted on 09/07/2009 12:05:26 PM PDT by Shellybenoit

In the aftermath of the Van Jones mess the questions about the White House vetting procedure still remained.

Are there a other people working at the White House with credentials that are much worse than Van Jones? If Jones was properly vetted, who overruled the vetting team and sponsored him to become part of the government? If the POTUS and his staff knew about Jones and his off the chart opinions, what does that say about the White House? Beyond his provocative statements, Jones is self described communist. Even though the cold war is long gone, that is still disturbing to most Americans. How could all of this slip through?

We finally have the answer, it didn't slip through--Jones was barely vetted at all. The president's use of Czars to get around Senate confirmation and congressional questioning of what the Czars are doing in office has come back and bitten the POTUS on his presidential posterior.

(Excerpt) Read more at yidwithlid.blogspot.com ...


TOPICS: Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: bho44; bhoczars; obamaczars; valeriejarrett; vanjones; vetting; whvetting
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

1 posted on 09/07/2009 12:05:26 PM PDT by Shellybenoit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Shellybenoit

Good post, thanks. We knew Van Jones believed the Truthers. It is good to see his disavowal refuted by the source.

Keep up the pressure!


2 posted on 09/07/2009 12:09:48 PM PDT by Freedom_Is_Not_Free (Depression Countdown: 55... 54... 53...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shellybenoit
TWe finally have the answer, it didn't slip through--Jones was barely vetted at all.

I would disagree with that statement. Jones was properly vetted and found to be perfectly qualified to spearhead The Kenyan's plan to "fundamentally transform America" with "green jobs", "green" being the new code word for communism disguised as environmentalism.

3 posted on 09/07/2009 12:09:54 PM PDT by randog (Tap into America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shellybenoit

Obama and others knew about Rev Wrong, too....It’s all those promises that politicians make....


4 posted on 09/07/2009 12:12:02 PM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shellybenoit

If we capture the House in 2010, is it possible to “unbudget” the czars going forward?


5 posted on 09/07/2009 12:13:52 PM PDT by nascarnation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: randog
"green" being the new code word for communism disguised as environmentalism.

This needs to be repeated and repeated often!!!

6 posted on 09/07/2009 12:16:38 PM PDT by varon (Allegiance to the constitution, always. Allegiance to a political party, never.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Shellybenoit

What did Obama Know and When did he know It?


7 posted on 09/07/2009 12:22:38 PM PDT by Sir Beowolf ("We The People")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shellybenoit
Van Jones Did Not Fill Out WH Questionnaire

Fox News correspondent James Rosen spoke with 911Truth.org spokesman Mike Berger on Friday and Berger said Jones knew what the petition said and agreed with its contents.

"He did agree with that statement and he did sign on to it," Berger said in a phone interview with Rosen. Berger said the group's "original board members individually confirmed all signatories that had signed on to the statement." Asked by what means the confirmation was obtained, Berger said: "They did it through email or on the phone."

An administration official said Jones never hid his controversial associations or remarks from the White House.

8 posted on 09/07/2009 12:24:48 PM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shellybenoit

A cult of personality arises when a country’s leader uses mass media to create
an idealized and heroic public image, often through unquestioning flattery and
praise.’

Now we know why the media didn’t question anything about Obama....And why Obama isn’t questioning anything about his czar’s.


9 posted on 09/07/2009 12:26:16 PM PDT by Freddd (Government run health care=paying more and being denied what we already have.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shellybenoit
Jones is self described communist. Even though the cold war is long gone, that is still disturbing to most Americans.

Yeah, and World War II ended 64 years ago--and who would say the same thing about a card-carying fascist????

10 posted on 09/07/2009 12:35:55 PM PDT by Lysandru
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shellybenoit

I figure Obama just wanted as many radical leftists as he could get in the White House.


11 posted on 09/07/2009 12:43:15 PM PDT by popdonnelly (Yes, we disagree - no, we won't shut up - no, we won't quit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shellybenoit

Hussein and his handlers are so breathtakingly arrogant that it probably never occurred to them that one of their choices would be questioned. And should it happen, media silence would quickly result in a loss of public interest.


12 posted on 09/07/2009 12:48:37 PM PDT by Oldpuppymax (AGENDA OF THE LEFT EXPOSED)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: varon

Cue “Watermelon Man” - green on the outside and red in the middle


13 posted on 09/07/2009 12:52:36 PM PDT by bt_dooftlook (John Adams: Our constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Shellybenoit

Vetted? Obama isn’t vetting anyone. He’s just picking as many radical-types as quickly as possible.


14 posted on 09/07/2009 1:12:14 PM PDT by madison10 (Fine with a black president, but not a Red one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: madison10

Right, he didn’t have to vet him, he already KNEW he was a radical commie and he liked it so he hired him.


15 posted on 09/07/2009 2:09:11 PM PDT by LegalEagle61 (If you are going to burn our flag, please make sure you are wearing it when you do!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: madison10

Obama wasn’t even vetted. Where is the documentation on his past?


16 posted on 09/07/2009 2:18:24 PM PDT by Dutch Boy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Dutch Boy

It’s just like the Clinton Administration when all of those people couldn’t pass the background check, so they did away with the background check.


17 posted on 09/07/2009 2:47:52 PM PDT by gman992
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Oldpuppymax
The White House, obviously concerned and maybe even in panic mode, are hair splitting now over this whole Van Jones vetting business and what they did and did not know in advance. Carefully choosing their words IMHO.

They are saying he did not fill out the questionnaire (lengthy).

That may or may not be a lie.

However, what HAS emerged this morning is that he filled out what is known as a S-86 (Special Form 86) where he listed in detail many things, which then created a discrepancy and raised *red flags*. In other words, he lied on it and they caught him. But the higher ups, (I assume Jarrett, perhaps Rahm, maybe even all the way to the President himself, OKed it regardless.

Van Jones documents on file cannot be destroyed. If somebody orders it, they must know that they face several federal punishment if caught. If any of them are lurking today, I would highly advise them not to touch such documents rather in hard file or data (soft) form, and just come clean on the whole thing.

18 posted on 09/08/2009 6:03:51 AM PDT by AmericanInTokyo (The tiger has been poked in the eye. He is going to be p*ssed. Better ramp our offensive two-fold.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: AmericanInTokyo
>>”Jones documents on file cannot be destroyed”>>>>

I wish that was true, remember Sandy “the” Burglar?

19 posted on 09/08/2009 6:13:50 AM PDT by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Ditter

ssssshhhh. i am warning and threatening them online. :-)


20 posted on 09/08/2009 6:18:09 AM PDT by AmericanInTokyo (The tiger has been poked in the eye. He is going to be p*ssed. Better ramp our offensive two-fold.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson