Skip to comments.
Devices that warn drivers of traffic cameras draw police ire (DC Area)
The Washington Examiner ^
| July 7, 2009
| Washington Examiner Staff Writer
Posted on 07/07/2009 7:01:26 AM PDT by Virginia Ridgerunner
Area drivers looking to outwit police speed cameras are using an iPhone application and other global positioning system devices that pinpoint the location of the cameras.
That has irked D.C. police chief Cathy Lanier, who promised her officers would pick up their game to counteract the devices, which can also help drivers dodge sobriety checkpoints.
"I think that's the whole point of this program," she told The Examiner. "It's designed to circumvent law enforcement -- law enforcement that is designed specifically to save lives."
(snip)
Photo radar tickets generated nearly $1 billion in revenues for D.C. during fiscal years 2005 to 2008.
In the current fiscal year, Montgomery County expects to make $29 million from its red light and speed cameras. Lanier said efforts to outlaw the software would be too difficult.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonexaminer.com ...
TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: cameras; dc; redlight
Yep, it's all about safety...
To: Virginia Ridgerunner
2
posted on
07/07/2009 7:02:22 AM PDT
by
montomike
(Politics should be about service and not a lucrative, money-making opportunity!)
To: Virginia Ridgerunner
“Photo radar tickets generated nearly $1 billion in revenues for D.C. during fiscal years 2005 to 2008.”
The crux behind police “concern” ...
3
posted on
07/07/2009 7:02:27 AM PDT
by
mgc1122
To: Virginia Ridgerunner
"It's designed to circumvent law enforcement -- law enforcement that is designed specifically to save livesgenerate revenue."
4
posted on
07/07/2009 7:03:22 AM PDT
by
doodad
To: Virginia Ridgerunner
"It's designed to circumvent law enforcement -- law enforcement that is designed specifically to save lives." If that were the case, they'd be happy about the application--people would be more careful around those intersections, and people would be safer.
But since there are fewer tickets, there is less revenue--that's what irks them.
5
posted on
07/07/2009 7:03:27 AM PDT
by
ShadowAce
(Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
To: Virginia Ridgerunner
Great, now we can have a technological arms race with traffic cameras to match the one with police radar. Hilarious.
6
posted on
07/07/2009 7:03:31 AM PDT
by
Dan Middleton
( Say no to political personality cults, on the left or the right.)
To: Virginia Ridgerunner
"law enforcement that is designed specifically to save lives generate revenue." There, fixed it.
To: Virginia Ridgerunner
Their “ire” only proves they are nothing but armed revenue collectors.
8
posted on
07/07/2009 7:05:24 AM PDT
by
SpaceBar
To: doodad
To: Charles Henrickson
Circumventing “red light cameras” is outlawry I can heartily endorse. They are nothing more or less than latter day revenuers.
To: Virginia Ridgerunner
“”It’s designed to circumvent law enforcement “
What law is broken by one not speeding through a red light or avoiding a police road block?
To: Virginia Ridgerunner
Good. If it’s all about safety, then do away with the fines and triple the penalty points awarded in traffic court. The morons are SO transparent.
12
posted on
07/07/2009 7:08:07 AM PDT
by
tgusa
(Gun control: deep breath, sight alignment, squeeze the trigger ....)
To: Virginia Ridgerunner
DC police have replaced the sound on their sirens with the ringing of a cash register. Cha-Ching!
13
posted on
07/07/2009 7:08:09 AM PDT
by
KarlInOhio
(Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, AIG, Chrysler and GM are what Marx meant by the means of production.)
To: Virginia Ridgerunner
"It's designed to circumvent law enforcement -- law enforcement that is designed specifically to save lives generate revenue." There ya go Chief Lanier. Fixed it for ya.
14
posted on
07/07/2009 7:08:32 AM PDT
by
Bloody Sam Roberts
(The code word for the new racism is "diversity.")
To: Rebelbase
What law is broken by one not speeding through a red light or avoiding a police road block? The Law of Supply and Demand. The police demand that you supply them with your money.
15
posted on
07/07/2009 7:09:33 AM PDT
by
KarlInOhio
(Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, AIG, Chrysler and GM are what Marx meant by the means of production.)
To: tgusa
That is the best call I’ve seen. Traffic enforcement stopped being about public safety as soon as the first dollar reached the pocket of a politician.
16
posted on
07/07/2009 7:09:54 AM PDT
by
Steamburg
( Your wallet speaks the only language most politicians understand.)
To: Steamburg
That’s the way to approach the issue at a City Council meeting - “I’m all for safety. To enhance the safety of law-abiding citizens, I propose we do away with the fines and (double, triple etc.) the penalty points per offense. Let’s get the unsafe drivers off the roads.” How could a politician argue against that?
17
posted on
07/07/2009 7:14:05 AM PDT
by
tgusa
(Gun control: deep breath, sight alignment, squeeze the trigger ....)
To: Admin Moderator
Sorry! Meant to hit reply and hit report abuse instead.
I’m clicker happy!
LOL! :)
18
posted on
07/07/2009 7:14:44 AM PDT
by
MikeWUSAF
(Extreme vitriol and rancorous replies served daily. - Mike W USAF)
To: Virginia Ridgerunner
...that is designed specifically to save lives. Pig manure. Traffic radar cams have one and only purpose - wealth transfer.
19
posted on
07/07/2009 7:16:32 AM PDT
by
libh8er
To: Virginia Ridgerunner
Lanier said efforts to outlaw the software would be too difficult. Just give Obama time.
20
posted on
07/07/2009 7:18:43 AM PDT
by
TADSLOS
(Sarah Palin: Sun Tzu of Politics)
>>It’s designed to circumvent law enforcement — law enforcement that is designed specifically to save lives.
Seems designed to circumvent an encroaching police state.
“Your papers, please”
21
posted on
07/07/2009 7:18:44 AM PDT
by
Betis70
(Keep working serf, Zero's in charge)
To: Virginia Ridgerunner
"I think that's the whole point of this program," she told The Examiner. "It's designed to circumvent law enforcement -- law enforcement that is designed specifically to save lives."Seems to me that anybody with enought wits about them to utilize such technology successfully is sufficiently sober to safely operate a motor vehicle. That leaves the threat to "revenue enhancement" as the chief reason to oppose this application.
22
posted on
07/07/2009 7:24:26 AM PDT
by
Tallguy
("The sh- t's chess, it ain't checkers!" -- Alonzo (Denzel Washington) in "Training Day")
To: Virginia Ridgerunner
Photo radar tickets generated nearly $1 billion in revenues for D.C. during fiscal years 2005 to 2008.
No more needs to be said.
23
posted on
07/07/2009 7:35:23 AM PDT
by
Dallas59
("You know the one with the big ears? He might be yours, but he ain't my president.")
To: Virginia Ridgerunner
Traffic cameras should be made unprofitable by the freedom-loving residents of any particular area.
24
posted on
07/07/2009 7:41:51 AM PDT
by
mysterio
To: Tallguy
That was my first thought, I’ve seen those drunks on Cops and they can’t even recite the alphabet.
25
posted on
07/07/2009 7:42:45 AM PDT
by
tiki
(True Christians will not deliberately slander or misrepresent others or their beliefs)
To: Rebelbase
Excellent point. If drivers are warned about where these cameras are located, then they will drive more safely in those areas, right? They will be careful about the traffic lights, and be careful about their speed. These warnings actually help law enforcement.
So why would they complain that someone is publicizing where these cameras are located? If it’s all about safety, there should be no complaints that drivers are driving more safely.
To: Virginia Ridgerunner
But, but I thought it was supposed to slow down drivers!
27
posted on
07/07/2009 7:46:01 AM PDT
by
bgill
(The evidence simply does not support the official position of the Obama administration)
“...law enforcement that is designed specifically to save lives.”.
What an utterly dumb statement!
No...law enforcement is designed to ENFORCE LAWS!
...that’s whay it’s called LAW ENFORCEMENT!
LIFE PRESERVERS are designed to save lives.
28
posted on
07/07/2009 7:49:12 AM PDT
by
woollyone
(I believe God created me- you believe you're related to monkeys. Of course I laughed at you!)
To: Betis70
You got it, a bunch of damn facists!
“Lanier said efforts to outlaw the software would be too difficult”
Screw you!
29
posted on
07/07/2009 7:49:19 AM PDT
by
east1234
(It's the borders stupid! My new environmentalist inspired tagline: cut, kill, dig and drill)
To: Virginia Ridgerunner
I thought the whole idea was the iconic “raise awareness” mantra of the post-war generation. Looks like the public is becoming quite aware, to me.
30
posted on
07/07/2009 8:07:37 AM PDT
by
Old Professer
(The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, then writes again.)
To: Virginia Ridgerunner
“It’s designed to circumvent law enforcement — law enforcement that is designed specifically to save lives.”
CORRECTION: “Law enforcement is designed to increase revenue through the issuing of citations and tickets.”
31
posted on
07/07/2009 8:08:49 AM PDT
by
Chewbacca
(Elect General Petraeus for President 2012)
To: Virginia Ridgerunner
Here's the dumb monkey who is making herself the joke of the day.
32
posted on
07/07/2009 8:19:05 AM PDT
by
Niteranger68
(Have you punished an 0bama supporter today?)
To: Niteranger68
She looks like Alice Tinker, for anybody's who's familiar with the "Vicar of Dibley."
To: Niteranger68
Is she an AA plant (affirmative action, female) or a qualified leader?
34
posted on
07/07/2009 9:06:09 AM PDT
by
JimRed
("Hey, hey, Teddy K., how many girls did you drown today?" TERM LIMITS, NOW AND FOREVER!)
To: JimRed
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson