Posted on 06/04/2009 11:10:39 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
6,000 words and half of them mush!
Ive only started going through the speech President Obama delivered in Cairo Thursday. Full text is here. The first thing that struck me is that he could have delivered a really good speech by cutting half of it out. Yes, leave out the apologies and the mountain of moral equivalence and the Bush blaming which simply validates extremist ideology and it would have been fine.
But when you make statements like this what purpose does it serve other than to strengthen extremism?
OBAMA: Around the world, the Jewish people were persecuted for centuries, and anti-Semitism in Europe culminated in an unprecedented Holocaust. Tomorrow, I will visit Buchenwald, which was part of a network of camps where Jews were enslaved, tortured, shot and gassed to death by the Third Reich. Six million Jews were killed more than the entire Jewish population of Israel today. Denying that fact is baseless, ignorant, and hateful. Threatening Israel with destruction or repeating vile stereotypes about Jews is deeply wrong, and only serves to evoke in the minds of Israelis this most painful of memories while preventing the peace that the people of this region deserve.
On the other hand, it is also undeniable that the Palestinian people Muslims and Christians have suffered in pursuit of a homeland.
(Excerpt) Read more at floppingaces.net ...
In the future, please place content from this site into our bloggers forum.
Thanks,
My sister in law's brother worked at the World Trade Center building 7 and on 9-11 he personally witnessed Americans splattering on the sidewalks. He said they were splattered like watermelons and that when they hit the ground only a red spray flew into the air. He said they went "kerplunk, kerplunk, kerplunk." He has never been the same since.
.
How quickly we forget.
Every America should be required to view this awesome 9/11 video made by a New Yorker who lived through it.
It has been viewed by millions, and is now in the Smithsonian.
http://attacked911.tripod.com/
.
INTREP
ping
"Likewise, it is important for Western countries to avoid impeding Muslim citizens from practicing religion as they see fit for instance, by dictating what clothes a Muslim woman should wear. We cannot disguise hostility towards any religion behind the pretence of liberalism."
I dont think any of us are being hostile towards muslims when we disagree with this. I dont have a problem with muslim women wearing them if THEY so choose. But THEY must choose that and their right to wear what they want cannot trump the absolute requirement for security and identification.
Otherwise, I liked the speech. It was not meant to minister to you and I. It was meant to reach out to the middle of the muslim world. It probably achieved that goal.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.