Who is it that you are really supporting? Palin or the idea of Palin, that she tells it like it is when the reality is she can’t even say “it” much less like “it is.” I sure would love a leader like the one that Palin Bullshits being like. She tries to project an image of a leader that she knows people want but that she isn’t capable of being. She Bullshits about being authentic. And that’s scary. Because a whole lot of people are buying it. She ain’t no Ronald Reagan or Margret Thatcher, because they actually HAD something to say and didn’t just talk about “having something to say.” That’s the difference. I don’t know, maybe I am being unfair. There is always that possibility, but right now I don’t think so. People only have to go on what they see and so far Palin’s performance sucks.
Look what we got here. Another Palin hater. This is one is not hiding it with a code words. Like a roach crawling on white carpet.
Go back to Democratic Underground or the DailyKos.
Please never darken FR with your presence ever again.
You have any examples? I think it's was the head of the other ticket that can't talk without training wheels. If McCain had won the election and then promptly died, do you think a President Palin would be unable to give a press conference without a teleprompter. Besides that, when you make completely unsupportable and uncheckable assertions that employ some figure of speech like like this, it just tells readers something about your your emotions and feelings, and nothing about Palin. It's like me saying that you don't have your groove on, and never will. What does that mean? What does that really tell anybody about you? Nothing? What does it tell them about me? That I'm a sloppy thinker.
I sure would love a leader like the one that Palin Bullshits being like. She tries to project an image of a leader that she knows people want but that she isn’t capable of being. She Bullshits about being authentic. And that’s scary.
Apart from the barnyard language better suited to DU, that's an incredibly lame and unverifiable pair of assertions. Exactly how do you know what kind of leader she's capable of being, and based on what? You sure thought she had leadership in her bones back in October. What has changed? Your employer? And what do you mean about her BSing about being authentic? Do you have a quote of her bragging about her authenticity? If you did, what would be scary about that? Do people with delusions of authenticity present a danger to the republic somehow?
I don’t know, maybe I am being unfair. There is always that possibility, but right now I don’t think so.
No. You're either in the employ of somebody threatened politically by Palin and it's your job to be a troll, or you are trying to be fashionable, and fit in with some set. I mean we all know she's a dope, right? What specifics are needed? You've presented shallow, not-ready-for-prime-time arguments about how shallow and not-ready-for-prime-time Palin is.
People only have to go on what they see and so far Palin’s performance sucks.
I'll ask again. When did you come to this conclusion (it had to be after Oct 4), and why does it differ so radically from your earlier opinion of her? And, have you ever stopped for just a minute to consider the outrageously unfair an impossible situation she was put in once the left identified her as a threat? Is there a person alive that seriously believes Joe Biden is a more substantial person that Palin? Did anybody ever ask Biden what he read with the clear implication that somebody as dumb as him maybe didn't know how? How would he have fared in such a confrontation? Would Charlie Gibson have scowled at Bidon while looking over his reading glasses? The "Palin is a Lightweight" thing is nothing more than a symptom of our misbegotten culture and the savagery the left projects toward anyone they culturally can't figure out. You've apparently fallen for it.