Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Fred

Okay, this statement:

“Wagoner confesses in his opinion piece that GM has “a weaker sales mix–essentially, we’ve sold fewer high-profit SUVs and more lower-profit cars.”

doesn’t match this statement:

“Detroit pumped out way too many gas-hog pickup trucks and SUVs – meaning, Escalades, Excursions, Suburbans — and did little to retool their plants toward what consumers wanted. That’s because Detroit earns much, much more money off of these cars versus smaller cars such as hybrids and fuel-efficient vehicles.”

Or am I misreading?


8 posted on 11/20/2008 8:45:29 AM PST by Larry Lucido (Free Brightside!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Larry Lucido
I read this article yesterday, and had the same thought. The writer sure seems to have a preconceived conclusion and just threw in some quote hoping for validation.

My read is that either the market for high margin vehicles (trucks) evaporated, or GM specifically targeted low margin vehicles for sales growth. Perhaps she's dinging them for not seeing a market shift to econoboxes five years ago, and retooling themselves. Hindsight is 20/10 in the blame fixing game.

11 posted on 11/20/2008 8:53:04 AM PST by Jack of all Trades (Change = Bait and Switch - Clinton III, here we come.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson