Skip to comments.
This is weird...?
hillary clinton forum ^
Posted on 10/25/2008 1:14:44 PM PDT by dascallie
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
1
posted on
10/25/2008 1:14:44 PM PDT
by
dascallie
To: dascallie
The saga continues; the plot thickens.
2
posted on
10/25/2008 1:16:32 PM PDT
by
Faith
To: dascallie
3
posted on
10/25/2008 1:17:24 PM PDT
by
Quix
(GLOBALIST PLANS FM 1900 ON #76 http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2031425/posts?page=77#77)
To: Faith
4
posted on
10/25/2008 1:18:00 PM PDT
by
PhiKapMom
( BOOMER SOONER -- VOTE FOR McCAIN/PALIN2008! LetsGetThisRight.com)
To: dascallie
AP just ran with it ... though ... of course ... that means little. They’d run with a claim that Palin is from Mars if the Obama Campaign ran it as a talking point.
5
posted on
10/25/2008 1:18:10 PM PDT
by
TexasGreg
("Democrats Piss Me Off")
To: dascallie
6
posted on
10/25/2008 1:19:50 PM PDT
by
lefty-lie-spy
(Stay metal. For the Horde \m/("_")\m/)
To: pissant
7
posted on
10/25/2008 1:20:09 PM PDT
by
Miss Didi
("Good heavens, woman, this is a war not a garden party!" Dr. Meade, Gone with the Wind)
To: dascallie
The decision was issued last night- it should be up on Pacer on Monday. The judge was being nice to Obama (PBUH) by issuing the decision on a Friday night- thereby averting any news cycles.
To: chet_in_ny
To: dascallie
This was posted today
link and this
link. Are these not accurate?
10
posted on
10/25/2008 1:23:11 PM PDT
by
mlizzy
To: dascallie
They have had this warning on their site for some time now.
We continue to see rumors about Berg v. Obama floating around the Internet. Some of them are even posted in the comments on this website. We will keep this site updated with the most current information, so please view with suspicion anything you see about this case which has not been published here.
The comments on this website are posted by visitors to this site and should not be taken as a communication from Phil J. Berg.
http://www.obamacrimes.com/
11
posted on
10/25/2008 1:23:43 PM PDT
by
lil'bit
To: Quix
I also lookwd on the website for the court & judge, and everyting is there EXCEPT the ruling. Seems that the concerned party would be informed....
12
posted on
10/25/2008 1:29:31 PM PDT
by
BigEdLB
(Let's get serious - there is only one choice - McCain/Palin 2008)
Comment #13 Removed by Moderator
To: IllumiNaughtyByNature
14
posted on
10/25/2008 1:46:07 PM PDT
by
Marie2
(Everything the left does has the effect and intent of destroying the traditional family.)
To: IllumiNaughtyByNature
Bt, as a principal to the suit, Berg should have been informed that a ruling had been made, or I think that would be Judicial misconduct. Besides a 6:15 PM ruling on a Friday does not pass the smell test, if no one was informed.
15
posted on
10/25/2008 1:52:39 PM PDT
by
BigEdLB
(Let's get serious - there is only one choice - McCain/Palin 2008)
To: dascallie
Yeah, like we really do need to get things even more complicated/confused!
16
posted on
10/25/2008 1:53:42 PM PDT
by
gunnyg
To: BigEdLB
I've reached out to a couple of people closer than I, who might be able to assist. I'll post any info if I get it. What surprises me is that there is nothing on bergs site but AmericanRight posted the same info and IIRC he was pretty close to the main participants.
I'll jump over there and see what's up. Can someone go to HRC and see if any more info is avail?
17
posted on
10/25/2008 1:59:34 PM PDT
by
IllumiNaughtyByNature
(Democrats don't have opposable thumbs and are scared of vacuum cleaners, like my dog.)
To: Marie2
18
posted on
10/25/2008 2:02:48 PM PDT
by
freebird5850
(O-Bomb-a, the sleeper cell that almost slipped by all of us.)
To: dascallie
Case Dismissed – Berg to appeal
So, who does have standing? According to the Hon. R. Barclay Surrick, that’s completely up to Congress to decide.
If, through the political process, Congress determines that citizens, voters, or party members should police the Constitution’s eligibility requirements for the Presidency, then it is free to pass laws conferring standing on individuals like Plaintiff. Until that time, voters do not have standing to bring the sort of challenge that Plaintiff attempts to bring in the Amended Complaint.
19
posted on
10/25/2008 2:03:18 PM PDT
by
street_lawyer
(Truth is a defense and the best offense.)
To: BigEdLB; All
Texas Darling just posted about Berg taking it to the USSC.
See here.
20
posted on
10/25/2008 2:06:47 PM PDT
by
IllumiNaughtyByNature
(Democrats don't have opposable thumbs and are scared of vacuum cleaners, like my dog.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson