Posted on 07/23/2008 7:39:37 PM PDT by pissant
This morning while trying to contact an individual who claimed to be one “James Barry” at 202-449-9737 I received a heck of a shock. See the previous article so I do not have to repeat it here.
Since posting the article this morning about the above phone number being answered by the DC Lobbyist Law Firm of Harris, Wiltshire & Grannis, several things have become known that causes me to be of the opinion that HW&G is not being completely honest about the association between its firm and the owner of the phone number which I was called from and harassed, and which Youtube removed a video of the recorded conversation had with the man claiming to be “James Barry.” One of the things coming to light is the following piece in USA Today, on the Senior Partner of HW&G, Scott Blake Harris:
Scott Blake Harris, managing partner of Harris, Wiltshire & Grannis, a Washington telecommunications law firm. Harris withdrew as a lobbyist for Microsoft and Cisco in June, but his partners still lobby, he said. “My practice isn’t going to be helped by this at all,” said Harris, who said he got involved with Obama after his 14-year-old son interned in the senator’s office. “I went to see him because of how nice he’d been to my kid, and I was captivated by his vision.”
http://www.usatoday.com/news/politics/election2008/2008-04-15-obama_n.htm
Another is the phone conversation this morning with Alex Bryson, Assistant to Scott Blake Harris, where Mr. Bryson (without me ever saying anything about the above number being his) in an extremely nervous and defensive tone states the phone number is not his (this before I even started to give him the number) and then hanging up on me without even taking the message for Mr. Harris. This conversation recording raises more questions than it answers that is for sure.
Now the following comment was posted on this blog and has sat in moderation until I received verification from William Wiltshire of HW&G that it was posted by him. Mr. Wiltshire emailed me stating he did make the comment and asked that it be posted. Below is the comment and the email I sent to verify that Mr. Wiltshire (below) was the person posting the comment.
RE: DID YOU SUBMIT THE FOLLOWING COMMENT? I WILL NOT ALLOW IT UNTIL I CAN CONFIRM IT CAME FROM YOU?
From: William Wiltshire
(WWILTSHIRE@harriswiltshire.com)
Sent: Wed 7/23/08 12:21 PM
To: Lawrence Sinclair (lws022737@hotmail.com)
Yes, I did. Please post it.
From: Lawrence Sinclair [mailto:lws022737@hotmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2008 1:05 PM
To: William Wiltshire
Subject: DID YOU SUBMIT THE FOLLOWING COMMENT? I WILL NOT ALLOW IT UNTIL I CAN CONFIRM IT CAME FROM YOU
Wiltshire
wwiltshire@harriswiltshire.com | 66.XXX.38.3
On behalf of Harris, Wiltshire & Grannis, I can assure you that the phone number you called is in no way associated with the firm or any of its employees. Unfortunately, for some unknown reason, whoever owns that number unilaterally chose to forward his calls to our main switchboard. Because no one here was aware of this, it is no surprise that no one knew what you were talking about when your call came in this morning. So far, we have been unable to determine whose number it is, but we have learned that it is a landline and not a cell phone. It also seems to have been disconnected within the last hour or so.
We are continuing to investigate and hope to know more soon. But one thing is sure — whoever called you from that number had nothing to do with this firm.
Bill Wiltshire
I do not accept nor do I believe the statement from Mr. Wiltshire and I will tell you why.
First, no one just picks a Law Firm to forward their phone calls to!
Second, the Law Firm not once, but several times stated (all recorded) the number belonged to one of the Firms Attorney’s!
Third, the number was actually set to be picked up by a fax machine this morning before it was disconnected, (again this is documented after someone claimed the number was disconnected it was called and in fact was picked up by a fax machine) it was only after the updates posted after the original article was published that the number was then disconnected.
Fourth, Youtube notifies its user’s under normal flagging when it removes a video, the phone conversation video was removed and YouTube still has not notified me they removed it or why.
Fifth, the office manager of Harris, Wiltshire & Grannis assured me the firm would contact me by the end of business today and they did not.
And finally, all this from a Firm that is so deeply embedded in the Telecommunications and IP, IT industry that they have the resources and knowledge to move so quickly in having this number pulled from service.
Now the following email was received as well, and I find it interesting the name used and the fact that it was sent through an email service that of course hides the original senders address. But let me make it clear, I am not scared and in fact what has been done is these people have made me more determined than ever to get to the bottom of all of this and expose Barack Obama and his Thugs for what they truly are.
Update to earlier post....
over here
ping
Larry Sinclair certainly knows how to document all that is going on concerning his attempts to get his story out. For his sake I hope he has a good attourney!
The harrassment from Obama supporters has expanded to many folks who had posted on Larry’s first blog. They are now filing complaints. Someone called into Sean’s show today and told what has been happening to her and many others who happened to post on Larry’s first site. Larry now has a more secure site and is documenting everything.
“The harrassment from Obama supporters has expanded to many folks who had posted on Larry’s first blog.”
This sounds like Obama has hired a portion of the Clintonian thugocracy, everybody better watch their backs.
UPDATE:
UPDATED 7-23-08 @ 10:06 PM CDT: It seems HW&G partner Mark Grannis (left) has a blog at Wordpress and it turns out that this blog has been ping backing every article I have posted on the old and new blog. Why?
http://larrysinclair0926.com/?p=552
Today Larry Sinclair posted his comments on how and why he is the most vetted non-candidate for President while Obama is not vetted at all. http://larrysinclair0926.com/
And the saga goes on.....
http://larrysinclair0926.com/?p=623#comment-55983
This past Friday Sean Hannity said that “something big was going to break this week about Obama”. Don’t think Sean would have said that unless there was really something going to break.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.