No Wonder they call it the “Clinton News Network”

gulf1 ^ | December 06, 2007 | Col. Robert L. Pappas

[Coleus]

Confession is good for the soul. It is also good for integrity and so, after finding egg on my face incident to "The Hypocrisy of the Front Runners," written November 1st, 2007; I confess that I was wrong. I wrote:"Then there's Mr. B. Hussein Obama, the Candidate who refuses to recite the Pledge of Allegiance, who prefers rather to slump with hands joined below his crotch in the body language of disdain during recitation of the Pledge."

It turns out that Mr. Obama's noted body language was during the singing of the National Anthem not the Pledge of Allegiance, although proper protocol requires that one place the right hand over the heart during the singing of the National Anthem as well. Candidate Barack Hussein Obama states that he always joins in the Pledge of Allegiance and that no one should run for the Presidency who does not. I stand corrected and apologize to readers for the error.

Moving on, it is notable that the Republicans are willing to go on CNN but the Democrats are not willing to face Fox News. No surprise, but notable. That reality is indicative of one of many underlying Democrat problems, in the instant case, honesty; not frankness, no question they are frank, but they are fundamentally dishonest. When at least one member of Bill Clinton's own party praised him for his unique ability to lie, that comment by, Senator J. Robert Kerry (D) of Nebraska, wiped away all doubt. But that isn't where it stops; their basic dishonesty leaps from one issue to the next with the agility of a feline (no offense to the feline) that if one did not know facts, one might even be persuaded to believe them.

However, one must give them credit for humor. Just read a piece in which one of their cohorts in the so called, "Mainstream Media" and there are more than a few on political left, hurls denigrating remarks about the Republican "Attack Machine." If ever a Party, indeed the leftist movement, is a master of both how to smear and the ability to attack, it is far and away those on the political left.

It is amazing how the political left views the world. Not that the right always gets it right, but the left is clearly afflicted with fried or loose neurons, or both. For example, Anderson Cooper's claiming that they had no idea that retired Army Reserve Colonel, Keith Kerr was affiliated with the Clinton Campaign. As one media commentator said, "that's a lot of crap." Although there is no real problem with having the candidates answer questions from the political opposition, there is a serious credibility problem with CNN's handling of the issue. One does not posit that questions to the Candidates are from undecided voters when in reality the questions were carefully selected to highlight the leftist social agenda and were proffered by the opposing Party's operatives.

One questioner, Kerr, that CNN previously had on their programming in support of their opposition to the "Don't ask, don't tell" policy, returned for the debate at CNN's invitation and expense to grandstand his position that homosexuals should be allowed to serve openly in the military. To Kerr, the retired teacher who served in the Army Reserve, California National Guard and was "asshole buddies" with an Episcopal Priest for 26 years, each of the Republican Candidates cited the "Don't ask don't tell" policy crafted by Bill Clinton and others, as being appropriate, and that otherwise it would have a negative impact on troop discipline and combat effectiveness. (For the record, homosexual perverts are allowed to serve in the military.) Incidentally, Kerr is no more a Brigadier General than I am, and that's not the half of it. He has an honorary title much the same as a Kentucky Colonel. Among those in the know, CNN has just demonstrated again that its agenda of promoting the left and leftist causes overrides both fact and integrity. No surprise there.

It is all but given that the left is in favor of protecting and promoting every sexually perverted act know to mankind, and probably some that are yet to be invented in the name of liberalism. They view this as completely normal notwithstanding the facts. First, it is not normal, it is a sexually unnatural aberration. Second, they take pride in standing reality on its head to convince folks that intolerance of sexual perversion is evil rather than condemn the evil acts in which homosexual perverts (yes, it's redundant) engage. Third, if one would take the time to learn about the wide-ranging perversion in which they engage, they couldn't find a maggot that would want to touch it. Then combine that with one branch of the sexually perverted crowd's agenda and one comes up with NAMBLA or North American Man Boy Love Association. Yes, it's just like it sounds, but should be "Sex Association."

Let's address love for the sake of discussion. Love is not sex. Sex is sex. Love is not taking advantage of a young girl or boy who is more interested in receiving the promised doll or baseball than performing oral sex on some pervert's anatomy. Those pathetic souls who choose to engage is sexually perverted behavior are destroying their own eternal souls and the souls of their victims, and have the temerity to openly advance behavior this is manifestly destructive to themselves and society?

What is love? God is love; I've learned about that love and let's get it straight, homosexual conduct is not love. This might offend some who have bought into the lie that homosexual behavior is genetic, but every time they try to cram it down the throats of mainstream society, they can expect a response from at least one writer.

Genetic? There is not one scintilla of scientific evidence that supports, much less proves that perverted sexual behavior to be genetic, not one. Like "human caused Global Warming," it is an article of "faith." On the other hand there is a plethora of fallacious information that supports the notion. Some time ago during a debate with an ACLU representative and a self-declared homosexual reject form the Air Force incident to his sexually perverted behavior, the ACLU representative said that there were hundreds of studies that support the notion that sexually perverted behavior is genetic. Unfortunately for him, he was refused to address the sexual predilections of the authors of those reports and/or their political agenda.

There are undoubtedly sexually normal liberals who in their religious zeal to promote the liberal agenda argue that sexually perverted behavior is a matter choice, just as they argue that killing an unborn child is a matter of choice. In my opinion, and mine is every bit as valid as the entire quackery of homosexual apologists, they are sex addicts. Does that excuse them? About as much as any untreated addict. Whenever I hear the lame excuse that they cannot help themselves, I am reminded that in this society, those who cannot help themselves are generally classified as insane, or at the least mentally unbalanced.

I have heard every lame explanation about the causes of perverted sexual conduct known to man, and remain convinced that it is a sin, "an abomination to God," and an addiction. A central question is, "Does God love them?" Of course God loves them, and so do I, God sent his own son Jesus to redeem all sinners. But one has to repent for redemption to matter.

Contemporary political leaders including Rudy, Mitt, Barack and Hillary all support behaviors that are inherently evil. How in Heaven's name can right thinking people support any of them? The problem is that so called, Christians have become so "liberal" that is, "anything goes, as long as one is sincere," that they fail the basic test for the label. There is no place in the Bible and most other religious guidebooks that perverted sexual behavior is acceptable among adherents. Given that, now, no doubt, they will invent their own religion to make it so. Yet, Rudy Guiliani, a Catholic and his endorser, Pat Robertson an Evangelical leader, embrace the underlying twin evil themes of killing of the unborn and advancement of the sexually perverted lifestyles. Get serious! Rudy doesn't give a hoot, but has Robertson forgotten that there will be a Judgment?

Someone recently posited the notion to the effect, what will sexual perverts do when parents who believe that their child may be potentially a sexual pervert, have it aborted?

Interesting question.

Semper Fidelis