You’re comparing two different points in time. Her responsiblities changed in April.
Regardless, calling her an office manager is just silly. She is a lawyer, an accomplished professional, and conducted an interview of witnesses in a high-profile murder investigation.
Look again at the responsibilities she was given.
I’m not sure why you want to diminish her inportance to the investigation.
In any event, look at her sworn testimony that is the basis of this thread.
You usually have zero tolerance for inconsistencies. Are you fine with her testimony?
“She is a lawyer, an accomplished professional, and conducted an interview of witnesses in a high-profile murder investigation.”
LOL - I’m not the one who is attempting to ridicule her.
“A. The intended role was I was going to be a team member in assisting with the measurement and documenting as a note taker on everything we were doing. However, we planned for the contingency, if we were met by any potential witnesses, especially if there was going to be any females among the potential witnesses, that I would attempt to conduct an interview with them.”
Assisting with measurement ... note taker ... IF we met witnessess ?
“But one of things that I was a participant in was interviewing on Lance Corporal Sharratt regarding the U.S. Army questionnaire that they provided us to ask them.”
This “lead invstigators” job appears to have been to read him a list of questions that were given to her and write down the answers.
“Q. And did anything with regards to what happened in house four come up during that interview?
A. No.
Q. Did you talk about anything with regards to what happened on 19 November 2005 in that interview?
A. No. “
She also mentions “assisting” at the end of an interview with Kallop.
Not a lot of responsibility there.
I don’t believe that you seriously think she was a mastermind sent out to specifically not bring her tape recorder so she could make promises to and falsify the testimony of the Iraqi women through a third-party interpreter,
... especially considering that “But the information we had was that we were likely to just get to homes that were empty, as they were in one and two.”