Posted on 09/23/2007 5:45:33 PM PDT by ianschwartz
‘60 Minutes’ resident liberal Scott Pelley wasn’t able to get Ahmadinejad to give a straight answer on whether he will build a nuclear bomb. Ahmadinejad also wouldn’t admit that Iran has been responsible for many military deaths in Iraq. After pressed on another topic, the Iranian leader said that he is a Muslim and can not lie. Bwhaha.
Note to self........liars lie about lying.
We only want the Sudetenland.
CBS punked, once again. They’ll never learn.
Slick as an enema.
Could this be a clue why the Columbia University President has invited him? Will they burn an American flag together?
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1901068/posts?page=55#55
http://www.truthusa.com/IRAN.html
http://memritv.org/subject/en/121.htm
Wow .. what is the source of that pic?
Note to self: Muslim and can not lie.
Note to non-Muslims: From Islam 101, section d:
Taqiyya — Religious Deception
at: http://jihadwatch.org/islam101/
>>
Due to the state of war between dar al-Islam and dar al-harb, reuses de guerre, i.e., systematic lying to the infidel, must be considered part and parcel of Islamic tactics. The parroting by Muslim organizations throughout dar al-harb that “Islam is a religion of peace,” or that the origins of Muslim violence lie in the unbalanced psyches of particular individual “fanatics,” must be considered as disinformation intended to induce the infidel world to let down its guard. Of course, individual Muslims may genuinely regard their religion as “peaceful” — but only insofar as they are ignorant of its true teachings, or in the sense of the Egyptian theorist Sayyid Qutb, who posited in his Islam and Universal Peace that true peace would prevail in the world just as soon as Islam had conquered it.
...
Historically, examples of taqiyya include permission to renounce Islam itself in order to save one’s neck or ingratiate oneself with an enemy. It is not hard to see that the implications of taqiyya are insidious in the extreme: they essentially render negotiated settlement — and, indeed, all veracious communication between dar al-Islam and dar al-harb — impossible. It should not, however, be surprising that a party to a war should seek to mislead the other about its means and intentions. Jihad Watch’s own Hugh Fitzgerald sums up taqiyya and kitman, a related form of deception.
“Taqiyya” is the religiously-sanctioned doctrine, with its origins in Shi’a Islam but now practiced by non-Shi’a as well, of deliberate dissimulation about religious matters that may be undertaken to protect Islam, and the Believers. A related term, of broader application, is “kitman,” which is defined as “mental reservation.” An example of “Taqiyya” would be the insistence of a Muslim apologist that “of course” there is freedom of conscience in Islam, and then quoting that Qur’anic verse — “There shall be no compulsion in religion.” {2:256} But the impression given will be false, for there has been no mention of the Muslim doctrine of abrogation, or naskh, whereby such an early verse as that about “no compulsion in religion” has been cancelled out by later, far more intolerant and malevolent verses. In any case, history shows that within Islam there is, and always has been, “compulsion in religion” for Muslims, and for non-Muslims....
<<<
Reason # 86,362 NOT to watch See-BS.
Is he sitting on a booster chair? Looks like he got his sports coat in the boys’ department at JC Penney.
That line was rich, wasn’t it?
The Quran instructs Muslims
1) it is OK to lie if it is in the cause of advancing Islam.
2) #1 above is particularly true if it is to deceive an infidel.
3) it is the duty of all Muslims to advance the cause of Islam and sharia law in becoming universal on Earth.
Ergo....the question becomes, "when can you ever trust a Muslim?"
The answer is self evident.....
When I figured this out, it was all I needed to know...
“The Quran instructs Muslims
1) it is OK to lie if it is in the cause of advancing Islam.
2) #1 above is particularly true if it is to deceive an infidel.
3) it is the duty of all Muslims to advance the cause of Islam and sharia law in becoming universal on Earth.
Ergo....the question becomes, “when can you ever trust a Muslim?”
Answer: You can’t!
He matched our best politicians on waffling around a direct question. What a weasel.
All of those medaled military folks on the review stand. Anybody think any of those medals are fake?
Switched the channel. I will NOT give President M.A. any of the attention he craves...period. Neither should our traitorous media.
Same here...I wouldn’t waste my time...we get enough lying from lamestream media...I was not going to listen to that sorry iranian liar either. We’ve got so much proof they’re killing our troops...so denying it PROVES HE NOTHING MORE THAN A LYING TERRORIST...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.