Liberal States Engaging in Anarchy For Illegals

Web Commentary ^ | 18 AUG 2007 | Sher Zeive

[radar101]

Showing once again that the will of the American people and the laws of the United States of America mean less than nothing to them, liberals and leftists have found a viable way to accomplish their continuing planned destruction of America—without the pesky practice of including the voting electorate. They have declared and established “sanctuary cities”, where the rule of law is no longer practiced or even encouraged. In fact, if certain laws are followed, said law-followers are subject to firing—if not arrest. New York City, Los Angeles, San Francisco, Denver, Cambridge, Baltimore and a growing number of other liberal and leftist-run cities have now been joined by the defiant pro-illegals faction in New Haven, Connecticut. And no one from the federal government appears to be doing anything—whatsoever—about these growing lawless and anarchistic hordes. In fact, as many members of the current administration seem to strongly support the illegals’ position, it is the illegals—not US citizens—who are given special considerations to not be required to uphold the laws of this country.

Note: When lawmakers and law enforcers refuse to adhere to and support the laws of a country, said country’s very existence will not long be an issue. Instead, it will fail and fall into the dusty pages of history as a ‘once-was’ entry.

Due to the unchecked and growing revolutionary contingents within our midst getting away with all manner of law-breaking, the chances of the United States of America surviving as a nation has—once again—taken a very large step backwards. As an example, speaking of the recent New Haven succession from sanity, Immigration Attorney Susan Church said of ICE (Immigration and Customs Enforcement): “…ICE is an agency that's under funded, that's irrational, that when they deal with immigration, they deal with it in an irrational and incompetent manner!” Because Ms. Church and others of her ilk believe that ICE is “incompetent and irrational”, they do not feel bound to uphold laws against the illegal multitudes’ entry into the USA. That’s their excuse and they’re sticking to it. Liberals believe—and are now very vocal about it—that if they don’t like and don’t agree with a law, they don’t have to follow it. Even those in the legal community—like Ms. Church—seem to believe they can now disobey the laws of the land rather than working to change them.

Note: Ms. Church and her like-minded colleagues know full well that if they actually tried to change the law to allow illegals the same or greater rights than those afforded US citizens, the American people would rise up against them; just as they did to stop the Illegals’ Amnesty Bill. Can’t have that, so these same lawbreakers established their sanctuary cities to both bypass the law and we-the-people.

As there have been no repercussions experienced by the pro-illegals’ lawbreakers, they have become increasingly comfortable with their defiance of the rule of law. These same criminals—with increasing membership from our leftist ‘legal’ community—also encourage the illegals to break the laws of the USA and to demand rights previously afforded only to those who have legally earned US citizenship. No doubt this is what inspired illegal alien Elvira Arellano, who had been hiding in the sanctuary of a Chicago church for over a year, to leave for Los Angeles. As nothing is being done by authorities to adhere to her deportation order—Ms. Arellano is a repeat illegal entry offender—she feels comfortable coming out into the open and beginning her new career as an illegal speaker for the anti-US Open Borders cause.

Note: Don’t forget. Without recognized and enforced borders, there can be no countries.

With an increasing number of lawbreakers being allowed to get off scot-free and we-the-people being prosecuted for upholding the laws of the land, can a new civil war be far away? Recently, I have been asked that question by a growing number of citizens.

One of our most revered presidents Abraham Lincoln, reminded us during his Gettysburg address that the US government was founded “of the people, by the people and for the people.” President Lincoln also commented that as long as this remained true, that government “shall not perish from the Earth.” When those who ignore the law are encouraged and those who maintain it are jailed—as were USBP agents and a Texas Deputy Sheriff—our government no longer adheres to these principles and the country is already in jeopardy of its survival; or has already died. Either we fight to continue our way of life or we submit to the worldwide terrorist groups—of myriad persuasions—that are fighting hard to end our way of life and our lives. At this juncture, we still have a choice. But, that choice may not exist for much longer.

US sanctuary cities: http://www.ojjpac.org/sanctuary.asp

http://www6.lexisnexis.com/publisher/EndUser?Action=

UserDisplayFullDocument&orgId=574&topicId=100046857&docId=l:656151717&start=2

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/chi-elvira18aug18,1,434861.story

http://bartleby.com/59/11/gettysburgad.html

---------------------------------------------------------

Biography - Sher Zieve

Sher Zieve is an author, political commentator, Staff Writer and Program Director for The New Media Alliance (www.thenma.org).

[Borax Queen]

New York City, Los Angeles, San Francisco, Denver, Cambridge, Baltimore and a growing number of other liberal and leftist-run cities have now been joined by the defiant pro-illegals faction in New Haven, Connecticut. And no one from the federal government appears to be doing anything—whatsoever—about these growing lawless and anarchistic hordes.

Anarchy ping.

[processing please hold]

Great article.

bttt

[processing please hold]

Thanks for posting this story.

[nicmarlo]

Without recognized and enforced borders, there can be no countries.

Exactly right!

[Borax Queen]

Oh, good, you found it!
This deserves another bump :0)

[processing please hold]

I'll see your bump and give it another.

This is a very important article. More FReepers should pay attention to it. But, alas...........

(maybe they're still at church)

[Borax Queen]

This is a very important article. More FReepers should pay attention to it. But, alas........... (maybe they're still at church)

Ya know... I have been telling myself the same thing for about the last four hours. I start to lose hope when articles like this (and another about the give-away of our country - http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1883348/posts) arouse few pings, little interest or anger.

[processing please hold]

I start to lose hope when articles like this (and another about the give-away of our country -

It's very disheartening indeed. *sigh*

[stephenjohnbanker]

“New York City, Los Angeles, San Francisco, Denver, Cambridge, Baltimore and a growing number of other liberal and leftist-run cities have now been joined by the defiant pro-illegals faction in New Haven, Connecticut. And no one from the federal government appears to be doing anything—whatsoever—about these growing lawless and anarchistic hordes.”

Not a peep out of the Bush Administration.

[stephenjohnbanker]

Excellent article.

[gubamyster]

ping

[nicmarlo]

why, naturally!

[nicmarlo]

This deserves another bump

one last, for me today. : )

[penowa]

"Note: When lawmakers and law enforcers refuse to adhere to and support the laws of a country, said country’s very existence will not long be an issue. Instead, it will fail and fall into the dusty pages of history as a ‘once-was’ entry."

Isn't that the goal of the elites, both REPUBLICANS and Democrats?

[B4Ranch]

With an increasing number of lawbreakers being allowed to get off scot-free and we-the-people being prosecuted for upholding the laws of the land, can a new civil war be far away? Recently, I have been asked that question by a growing number of citizens.

Not surprisingly, that question does come up in conversations these days.

[Borax Queen]

The elites would like that, wouldn’t they? Easier to declare martial law and corral us then, while they sit behind their gates and are served tea?

[Travis McGee]

Current federal law 8USC 1373(a) PROHIBITS SANCTUARY CITIES. It reads as follows:

"Notwithstanding any other provision of federal, state, or local law, a federal, state, or local government entity or official may not prohibit, or in any way restrict any government entity or official from sending to, or receiving from, the Immigration and Naturalization Service information regarding the citizenship or immigration status, lawful or unlawful, of any individual."

QUISLING: a synonym for traitor, someone who collaborates with the invaders of his country.

U.S. Constitution, Article 4 Section 4:

"The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government,

and shall protect each of them against Invasion;"

---

Invasion: \In*va"sion\, n. [L. invasio: cf. F. invasion. See Invade.] [1913 Webster]

1. The act of invading; the act of encroaching upon the rights or possessions of another; encroachment; trespass.

[Travis McGee]

With an increasing number of lawbreakers being allowed to get off scot-free and we-the-people being prosecuted for upholding the laws of the land, can a new civil war be far away? Recently, I have been asked that question by a growing number of citizens.

Reminds me of a book I wrote.

[PGalt]

Outstanding article. Thanks for posting. Outstanding post. Thanks.

Thanks for the ping, gubamyster. Thanks to all contributors to this thread.