To: cryptical; All
"... shields mice against developing lung cancer under conditions
thought to mimic the effects of smoking" Hmmmm?? Maybe it wasn't the stem cells .. maybe the effects of smoking they used are all a lie ..?? What if you can't get lung cancer from 2nd hand smoke ..?? How will they be able to tell ..??
8 posted on
11/11/2006 7:26:34 PM PST by
CyberAnt
(Drive-By Media: Fake news, fake documents, fake polls)
To: CyberAnt
Hmmmm?? Maybe it wasn't the stem cells .. maybe the effects of smoking they used are all a lie ..?? I have to assume they had control mice that did not get the treatment that were compared against. This is normal practice, and the research is a total sham if they didn't.
55 posted on
11/11/2006 9:41:07 PM PST by
AndyTheBear
(Disastrous social experimentation is the opiate of elitist snobs.)
To: CyberAnt
Yep, and here it was in the article:
The stem-cell injection protected 20 out of 25 mice from developing tumours, whereas tumours grew in all unvaccinated mice.
57 posted on
11/11/2006 9:42:12 PM PST by
AndyTheBear
(Disastrous social experimentation is the opiate of elitist snobs.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson