Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: cryptical

bravo sierra


2 posted on 11/11/2006 7:21:47 PM PST by yldstrk (My heros have always been cowboys-Reagan and Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: yldstrk
bravo sierra

Are you a stem cell expert?

11 posted on 11/11/2006 7:31:37 PM PST by zarf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: yldstrk

Well, you persuade me with your logic and reasoning.

It's a moral issue, not a scientific issue. Those who deny that the science has no potential, because of moral issues, loses on both because it isn't moral to deny truth just to get your moral values pushed.

An example. You are morally opposed to nukes in 1942. You tell the world that they just don't work. But the Manhattan project occurs. Now, it's time to use it, does anybody listen to you?

Question the ethics of using it, don't deny the science, unless you have evidence to support you.


13 posted on 11/11/2006 7:35:10 PM PST by dogbyte12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: yldstrk

Seems to me that Not Smoking would be an easier, cheaper and more ethical solution.


21 posted on 11/11/2006 7:49:26 PM PST by trumandogz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson