Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is it terrible that I just don't care?
Me and my big mouth

Posted on 10/04/2006 2:24:13 PM PDT by slightlyovertaxed

Is it terrible that I spend most of the time reading this whole Foley/Hastert disaster with my eyes firmly planted at the top of their sockets in mid-roll? Is it wrong that when I hear Representative DoubleChin of Some-Town-I'll-Never-Visit, MN* has had an affair, my first thought is "Dear Lord, who in their right mind would marry this guy in the first place, let alone have sex with him?"

I've learned in life that someone's moral failings in one area do not necessarily translate into universal moral failings. I have a terrible temper, but I would never take drugs, steal, or cheat. People who steal but would never murder. People who murder but are faithful to their wives. People who cheat on their wives but won't cheat on their taxes. Thus, you select people for jobs based on the areas of their morals where they succeed. A man with a weakness for drink but a fondness for honesty would make an excellent accountant but a terrible bartender.

If the Mayor decides that he should follow through on the come-hither looks that cute blond on the fourth floor is giving him, I really don't care. Seriously. (In fact, I would argue that planting the image in my mind of him and her doing something other than chatting may be grounds for suing the local news media.) I didn't elect him for his libido or lack thereof; I elected him to run my city. I sure as h*ll won't care that he was faithful to his wife when I discover he's been taking the city's taxes and spending them on his racecar collection.

People who have moral failings, but commit no crimes, should be free from this ridiculous obsession we have with their private parts. The minute the moral failings cross into criminal acts, i.e. trying to molest a teenage boy, that is when we drop the d*mn hammer. Do you think if Foley had been anyone but Representative Foley, he would have been left free? Of course not. If he were Mr. Car Salesman Foley, he'd be in jail. (Thanks to Chris Rock for the inspiration.) It's not illegal to be an alcoholic until you drink while doing something you shouldn't be drinking during. It's not illegal to have a bad temper until you break something in anger. And it's not illegal to diddle the girl next door unless she's under 18 and/or unwilling. Sorry folks.

I am guessing I'm alone in this, but I feel like it had to be said.

*No offense to the fine people of Minnesota.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: opinions; priorities; sillysexscandals; vaniety

1 posted on 10/04/2006 2:24:15 PM PDT by slightlyovertaxed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: slightlyovertaxed

Can't say I don't sympathize, most people would probably agree with most of that.

People who prey on children should be exposed...and then castrated. Aside from that, stop wasting my time.


2 posted on 10/04/2006 2:27:31 PM PDT by NYIslander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: slightlyovertaxed
Ya know...I really don't care either. I really don't care about the Democrats nor the Republicans anymore. It seems that all the both parties want is to destroy each other, not represent the people.

I am really thinking of not voting next month nor in 08.

My .02 cents.

3 posted on 10/04/2006 2:29:21 PM PDT by GulfWar1Vet (I will not submit to Islam. Too bad that the Democrats already have. Have you submitted to Islam?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: slightlyovertaxed
Someone who emails (or IM's) a child about sex - as Foley did - is a moral failure. His pro-abortion views also indicate his lack of moral integrity.

I make this prediction: By the end of the week, we will hear news that Foley went beyond internet sex with boys. He had real sex with them.

This is why morality maters.

4 posted on 10/04/2006 2:32:12 PM PDT by Responsibility2nd (Abortion is to family planning what bankruptcy is to financial planning)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: slightlyovertaxed
The Dem's are undermining their own base who supports gay marriage...which will result in gay adoption, the pedophiles dream! They are reinforcing the publics view that gay = pedophile.

They have stepped in it now!

5 posted on 10/04/2006 2:33:30 PM PDT by Voltage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: slightlyovertaxed

Foley is a problem but he isn't my problem.


6 posted on 10/04/2006 2:34:50 PM PDT by cripplecreek (If stupidity got us into this mess, then why can't it get us out?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: slightlyovertaxed

All I want from the gov't is for them to stay out of my wallet, my property, and my business. ...out of my face, essentially. Tall order, apparently.


7 posted on 10/04/2006 2:36:13 PM PDT by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Voltage

The Dem's are undermining their own base who supports gay marriage...which will result in gay adoption, the pedophiles dream! They are reinforcing the publics view that gay = pedophile.

The base know what they are doing. They are tripping Pubbies on their high standards.


8 posted on 10/04/2006 2:37:16 PM PDT by Chickensoup (If you don't go to the holy war, the holy war will come to you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: slightlyovertaxed
Is Foley being accused of molesting this boy or sending him a dirty e-mail after he left the page program? A 16 or 17 year old boy is old enough to ignore an e-mail and get on with his life if he has no tendencies in the homosexual direction. This is an attempt to keep people from voting for republicans.

Please folks, lets not let the democrats succeed with their dirty little scheme.
9 posted on 10/04/2006 2:39:22 PM PDT by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

There could be more stuff we don't know, but some blogger found the guy the 2003 IMs were sent to, and it turns out he's 21 years old now, which means he was 18 when the IMs were sent.

He also graduated the page program in 2002, so he was NOT a page at the time the IMs were sent.

I think it's disgusting anyway, but now we are talking about a consensual IM conversation between two adult males, with NO position of authority being in play.

The problem with a story like this is you never know what is coming next, and the initial impression makes it nearly impossible to get the truth out later on.


10 posted on 10/04/2006 3:00:56 PM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: slightlyovertaxed

I care to the extent that I would really like to know how he managed to get away with it for such a length of time, and whether there are more like him out there.


11 posted on 10/04/2006 3:04:44 PM PDT by thoughtomator (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson