Vetting nominees is her job.
Anybody who believes the above could be sold the Brooklyn Bridge in a heart beat.
As it is we still haven't seen any cases to get a good read of how the new justices will behave.
I'm lookin' for disinformation here. Don't think Harriet is a problem.
I was very strongly opposed to the Miers nomination. But it's impossible to tell whether this story has any basis or not.
The Alito nomination was more or less forced on the administration by the firestorm that the Miers nomination provoked.
Is Miers now resentful of what happened? Who knows?
Hmm. After getting thoroughly trashed by them, they expect her to cheerfully approve their recommendations...
Maybe I'm missing something.
why is she still even around?
thank goodness we got Alito up there.
I heard from confidential sources the two complaintants are RAT sympathizers. Of course, I cannot reveal my sources.
Nobody else wants the job, right? END SARCASM!
I liked her in that Barneycam classic, 'Where in the White House is Miss Beazley?'
Hell hath no fury...
arlen ex-spector-ant is bitching about anything that can hurt the Whitehouse. I would really like to know just what the heck they did to that POS brain of his?
LLS
Oh yeah, yeah. Unnamed sources, blah, blah, blah.
more info here:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1628974/posts?page=2
Miers is in the loop for sure, let's see what develops - at some point, specific names of possible candidates who were rejected will surface.
I hear Karl Rove is going to use the judges issue to fire up the base, I wonder which base he is talking about? The base that actually wins elections for Republicans? Karl Rove knows who to turn to...:)
She is still causing trouble.